: Comment concilier devoir de discrétion professionnelle et obligation d’information du public ? En premier lieu, il convient de noter que l’obligation de discrétion professionnelle résulte du secret administratif qui s’imposait traditionnellement à l’administration. Cependant, le principe de la liberté d’accès aux documents administratifs proclamé par la loi n° 78-753 du 17 juillet 1978 (1) dont les […] The post Le devoir de discrétion professionnelle des agents publics appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Existe-t-il des cas d’inéligibilité ou d’incompatibilité opposables aux agents publics ? Pour rappel, une inéligibilité consiste en l’impossibilité pour un agent public de déposer sa candidature pour une élection à un mandat. L’incompatibilité permet à l’agent de se présenter et, s’il est élu, de choisir entre la conservation de son activité publique ou celle de son […] The post La situation administrative des fonctionnaires candidats et élus locaux appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Que doit contenir le dossier individuel de chaque agent public ? Conformément aux dispositions de l’article L. 137-1 du CGFP, le dossier individuel de chaque agent doit comporter toutes les pièces intéressant sa situation administrative de l’agent, depuis son recrutement jusqu’à la cessation de ses fonctions. Il n’existe pas de liste réglementaire fixant la composition du […] The post Le dossier individuel de l’agent public (1ère partie) appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Quelles sont les conséquences d’une annulation contentieuse par le juge administratif ? L’annulation d’un acte par le juge administratif entraîne sa disparition rétroactive. En effet celui-ci est réputé n’être jamais intervenu. En conséquence, il appartient alors à l’administration d’adopter les mesures nécessaires permettant de faire disparaître toutes les conséquences que la décision annulée a fait naître […] The post Actes des ressources humaines dans le secteur public : les effets d’une annulation contentieuse (2de partie) appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Comment gérer le dossier individuel d’un agent ? Les règles générales de gestion des dossiers individuels En application des dispositions de l’article L. 137-1 du CGFP, le dossier de chaque agent public doit comporter toutes les pièces intéressant sa situation administrative enregistrées, numérotées et classées sans discontinuité. En outre, comme le prévoit l’article R. 137-4 du […] The post Le dossier individuel de l’agent public (suite et fin) appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Quels sont les différents types de bulletins relatifs au casier judiciaire ? Trois bulletins composent le casier judiciaire. Le bulletin n° 1 est un relevé intégral des fiches du casier judiciaire, il contient l’ensemble des condamnations et sanctions administratives prises à l’encontre d’une personne. Il n’est délivré qu’aux autorités judiciaires. Le bulletin n° 2 contient la […] The post Le casier judiciaire et les agents publics appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: En quoi consiste l’obligation d’exécuter les décisions de justice ? L’obligation d’exécuter les décisions de justice s’impose à toute administration. Les décisions du juge administratif, dont celles rendues par le juge des référés (du fait de l’urgence d’une situation) ont force exécutoire. Cela signifie que l’obligation d’exécuter s’applique dès la notification de la décision à l’administration. […] The post Actes des ressources humaines dans le secteur public : les effets d’une annulation contentieuse (1ère partie) appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Quels sont les actes soumis à l’obligation de motivation ? En application des dispositions de l’article L. 211-2 du code des relations entre le public et l’administration (CRPA) : « Les personnes physiques ou morales ont le droit d’être informées sans délai des motifs des décisions administratives individuelles défavorables qui les concernent ». L’obligation de motivation ne […] The post Les règles relatives à la motivation des actes des ressources humaines appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Une notificationa pour but d’informer le destinataire d’un acte qu’une mesure administrative (en particulier un arrêté) a été prise à son égard. Conformément aux dispositions de l’article L. 221-8 du code des relations entre le public et l’administration (CRPA), elle rend l’acte individuel opposable à la personne qui en fait l’objet, tout en conditionnant son […] The post La notification des actes individuels relatifs aux ressources humaines appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: Composée par cinq décrets datés du 10 juin 2026 et publiés au Journal officiel du 12 juin suivant (1), cette réforme modifie, notamment, le statut particulier du cadre d’emplois des administrateurs territoriaux, ainsi que celui des emplois fonctionnels administratifs de direction des collectivités territoriales et de leurs établissements publics et crée un régime indemnitaire spécifique. […] The post La réforme de la haute fonction publique de la fonction publique territoriale appeared first on Le Blog GERESO
: A revised first edition of the Canadian Open Access Legal (COAL) Citation Guide/Guide canadien de la référence juridique en accès libre (RJAL) is now available. The guide’s editors have incorporated reader feedback and corrections into a revised edition. Some of the changes include moving the general rules to their own section and revising rules on citing regularly updated books, regulations, administrative decisions, and generative AI for greater clarity and increased consistency across the guide. Additions to the guide include guidance on creating a bibliography/table of authorities and on citing reports, dissertations, municipal by-laws, court materials, First Nations, Métis, and Inuit - Crown Treaties, amongst other sources. A more detailed list is in the guide’s introduction. Since the publication of the guide in June 2024, the editors have led multiple online training sessions and conference workshops. We are now working on training materials that reflect the revised edition. The francophone editors c[...]
: Case number: AC-2026-LON-002515 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court In the matter of an application for judicial review 17 July 2026 Before: The Hon. Mr Justice Sheldon Between: The King on the application of (1) RDS (2) Bayswater Support Group (Claimants) -v- Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Defendant) and NHS England (Interested Party) Order Notification of the Judge’s Decision (CPR 54.11, 54.12) Following consideration of the documents lodged by the Claimant, the Defendant’s Summary Grounds of Defence and the Claimant’s Reply ORDER BY THE HON. Mr Justice Sheldon (1) Anonymity a. Pursuant to CPR 39.2(4) and s. 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998: i. the names of the First Claimant, his children and his former spouse are to be withheld from the public and must not be disclosed in any proceedings in public; ii. the name of the chair of the Second Claimant, her children and any partner are to be withheld from the public and must not be disclosed in any proceedings [...]
: UT ref: UA-2026-000083-PIP In the Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber 28 October 2026 Before: Stewart Wright Judge of the Upper Tribunal Between: LC -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Anonymity Order Appellant: LC Respondents: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Tribunal: First tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) Tribunal venue: Scarborough Tribunal Case Nos: SC231/24/00181 Tribunal decision date: 29 August 2025 NOTICE: Any breach of this order is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum punishment that may be imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine. It is ordered , under rule 14(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal Rules) 2008, that, without the permission of this Tribunal, no one shall disclose or publish the name, or any part of the address, of the appellant in these proceedings or publish [...]
: Labour and employment — Grievances — Referral to adjudication — Whether the First Decision conclusively determined the grievance was not properly before the Board — Collective agreement grievance procedure and requirement to present the grievance at each level — Parties may skip levels only on mutual consent — Board treated failure to judicially review or seek reconsideration as determinative — Application dismissed Procedure — Time limits — Extension of time — Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Regulations, para. 61(b) — Whether the Board reasonably refused an extension of time in the interest of fairness — Clear, cogent and compelling reasons for delay required — Deadlines brief and precise and bargained for under the collective agreement — Extension refused and application dismissed Procedure — Time limits — Computation of time — Whether the 10-business-day period to transmit the grievance began only after the judicial review deadline expired — Board rejected the proposed start date for running of the[...]
: The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against Illusory Systems Inc. for failing to implement adequate data security measures, leading to a major security breach in which hackers stole $186 million from consumers. Under a proposed order settling the FTC’s allegations, Utah-based Illusory, which does business as Nomad, will be required to implement an information security program to address numerous alleged security failures and to return recovered money to affected consumers. “The FTC Act requires companies to take reasonable security measures,” said Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “It’s important that companies live up to their security promises to consumers.” In its complaint , the FTC alleged that Nomad prominently touted its security in its advertising, claiming that it offered “security-first” services. The FTC, however, alleged that the company failed to live up to these promises by failing to: use secure coding practices; implement processes for recei[...]
: Brussels, 09 April - The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has published its 2025 Annual Report . The report provides an overview of the EDPB work carried out in 2025 and reflects on important milestones, such as the adoption of the Helsinki Statement on Enhanced Clarity, Support, and Engagement . “In 2025, we saw the data protection landscape change significantly. The rapid expansion of the EU’s digital regulatory framework has added complexity to the data protection ecosystem. To help organisations navigate this complexity and support compliance, the EDPB focused on enhancing legal certainty, making compliance more achievable in practice, and strengthening cooperation, both among Data Protection Authorities and with other regulators. We also prioritised meaningful dialogue with stakeholders to ensure our work reflected real-world needs. Our achievements support economic growth while continuing to protect individuals’ fundamental rights to privacy and data protection.” EDPB Chair, Anu Talus The Hel[...]
: FleetCor and its CEO will pay $100 million to settle a Federal Trade Commission administrative action alleging that the company charged its customers, who overwhelmingly are small businesses, undisclosed fees in connection with their use of fuel cards that FleetCor falsely promised businesses would save them money. In a complaint first filed in federal court in 2019 , the FTC alleged that FleetCor Technologies Inc., now known as Corpay Inc., and its CEO Ronald Clarke imposed a broad array of unauthorized fees that its customers never knew about and did not agree to pay, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars and harming tens of thousands of customers. In addition, FleetCor charged late fees to customers who had either paid on time or were prevented by FleetCor from paying on time. FleetCor also misrepresented the gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees associated with its fuel cards. “FleetCor deceived its small business customers by promising fuel savings that never materialized, while unfairly cha[...]
: The Federal Trade Commission today moved to block medical device supplier Edwards Lifesciences Corp.’s (Edwards) proposed acquisition of JenaValve Technology, Inc. (JenaValve) due to concerns that the acquisition would limit patient access to lifesaving medical devices used to treat a potentially fatal heart condition. The FTC alleges that over the span of two days in July 2024, Edwards executed agreements to acquire both JenaValve and JC Medical, the two leading companies competing to bring to market transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices that treat a heart condition called aortic regurgitation (TAVR-AR devices). Edwards closed its acquisition of JC Medical in August 2024, and its proposed $945 million acquisition of JenaValve would combine the only two companies with ongoing clinical trials in the United States for a TAVR-AR device. The deal threatens to reduce competition in the TAVR-AR market, likely resulting in reduced innovation, diminished product quality, and potentially increased prices for[...]
: Background information Date of final decision: 15 May 2025 National case Controller: SOLOCAL MARKETING SERVICES Legal Reference(s): Article 7 (Conditions for consent), Article 6 (Lawfulness of processing) Decision: administrative fine and an order to cease electronic commercial prospecting in the absence of valid consent, together with a penalty of 10 000 € per day overdue after a period of 9 months Key words: administrative fine, consent, unsolicited communication Summary of the Decision Origin of the case As the French Supervisory Authority (SA) made commercial prospecting a priority topic for investigations in 2022, it focused on the practices of professionals in the sector, particularly those who resell data, including the many intermediaries in this ecosystem known as data brokers. The French SA carried out investigations on SOLOCAL MARKETING SERVICES which got prospect data mainly from data brokers, publishers of game contests and product testing sites (these actors are the first links in the cha[...]
: Background information Date of final decision: 15 May 2025 National case Controller: SOLOCAL MARKETING SERVICES Legal Reference(s): Article 7 (Conditions for consent), Article 6 (Lawfulness of processing) Decision: administrative fine and an order to cease electronic commercial prospecting in the absence of valid consent, together with a penalty of €10 000 per day overdue after a period of 9 months Key words: administrative fine, consent, unsolicited communication Summary of the Decision Origin of the case As the French Supervisory Authority (SA) made commercial prospecting a priority topic for investigations in 2022, it focused on the practices of professionals in the sector, particularly those who resell data, including the many intermediaries in this ecosystem known as data brokers. The French SA carried out investigations on SOLOCAL MARKETING SERVICES which got prospect data mainly from data brokers, publishers of game contests and product testing sites (these actors are the first links in the chai[...]