🕒

RSS JSON

civics race sufficiently clause amendment review held unc strict could north fellows universities local that action cases supreme university sffa protection discrimination law survive admissions based affirmative harvard not wrongs statistical their invalidated

3 Résultats (1 - 3)

🌍 New Civics Education Program Puts a Local Lens on Landmark Supreme Court Cases (Judiciary News - United States Courts)

[6/4/2024] : Twenty-two high school students in the St. Louis area were the first to participate in a new civics education program teaching them about the federal Judiciary through a landmark Supreme Court case that originated in their hometown and local

🌍 SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[11/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review

🌍 SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[13/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review