🕒

RSS JSON

race were their compelling sufficiently wrongs protection equal strict survive could review fair post inc president fourteenth that universities amendment held fellows invalidated var majority college north under university statistical action affirmative not

2 Résultats (1 - 2)

🌍 SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[11/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review

🌍 SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[13/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review