: Lifetime sex offender registration statutes are common across the states, and several statesupreme courts have reached conflicting results in analyzing the constitutionality of... The post State ex rel. D.D. appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: The Supreme Court has long declared itself “supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution.” But that does not leave the state... The post People v. Thompson appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a state law that prohibits transgender minors from accessing gender-affirming care. The post Skrmetti Beyond Scrutiny appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court failed to fully clarify the “unquestionably muddy” relationship between Article III and the Seventh Amendment. Yet it... The post Sun Valley Orchards, LLCv. United States Department of Labor appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: At some point, less than two decades after the United States Supreme Court found racial segregation in the public schools to be unconstitutional, the... The post Blown Chances appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.* In a bench statement delivered when the Supreme Court convened on May 9, 2025, Chief Justice Roberts offered... The post In Memoriam: Justice David H. Souter appeared first on Harvard Law Review
: A longstanding choice-of-law rule known as the internal affairs doctrine has predominated over corporate law matters in the United States since at least the 1860s. Acknowledged by the Supreme Court and generally followed by the states, the doctrine holds that the internal affairs of a corporation are governed by the law of the state where it is incorporated, notwithstanding where it may be headquartered. The post Dormancy and Delaware: An Emerging Threat to the Internal Affairs Doctrine appeared first on Harvard Law Review