: Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2298 (Admin) Case No: AC-2024-LON-003318, AC-2024-LON-003499, AC-2024-LON-003464 and AC-2024-LON-003282 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 7 September 2026 Before: Mr Justice Dexter Dias Between: The King on the application of Barclays Bank UK plc National Westminster Bank plc Vanquis Bank Limited Santander UK plc -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited and Aaron Domer Arnold Gajraj Deborah Campbell Jojo Brown (Interested parties) and Financial Conduct Authoruty (Intervener) The post Barclays Bank UK plc and others -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
: Neutral citation number: [2026] EWCA Civ 1373 Appeal numbers: CA-2026-000295 Case number: AC-2025-LON-001421 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING’S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Mrs Justice Collins Rice [2025] EWHC 3359 Admin Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 30 October 2026 Before: SIR GEOFFREY VOS, MASTER OF THE ROLLS LORD JUSTICE BEAN, VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) and LORD JUSTICE ZACAROLI Between: PJSC VTB BANK and HM TREASURY and VTB CAPITAL PLC (IN ADMINISTRATION) The post PJSC VTB Bank -v- HM Treasury and VTB Capital PLC (in administration) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
: As a supplement to our Sunday Summary each month, Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa presents Supreme One-Liners, a super-short descriptive guide to the most recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers its more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter , summarizing all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted. Appeals Constitutional Law/Courts: Review of Delegated Powers Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28 (41576) Clarifications re courts’ jurisdiction as to legality of delegated power exercise. Civil Litigation: Spoliation of Evidence SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp . . . [more] The post Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners appeared first on Slaw
: One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers a weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter, to which you may subscribe . It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from June 26 – August 31, 2026 inclusive. Appeal Civil Litigation: Spoliation of Evidence SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp , 2024 ONCA 675 ; 2026 SCC 29 (41543) July 31, 2026 Spoliation is the intentional destruction, alteration, mutilation, or concealment of evidence . . . [more] The post Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy appeared first on Slaw
: Claim No: KB-2026-002571 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 29 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Fordham Between: HXS -v- Daniel Ryan Kane Robert Samms Dylan Nelson The person or persons unknown (a) who have communicated with the Claimant by email from the email address dannyryan_94@hotmail.co.uk; or (b) who have communicated with the Claimant by ordinary text message from +1 917 722 9086; or (c) who has communicated with the Claimant by WhatsApp numbers +1 940 601 2821 and +44 7423 436872; or (d) who have communicated with the Claimant by Telegram accounts @edm2181 and @dg96dg; or (e) who have communicated with the Claimant via the Seeking dating website; or (f) who use or have used a Revolut account under the name Daniel Ryan with the GB IBAN GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and the BIC/SWIFT code REVOGB21; or (g) who use or have used the Wise bank account under the name Kane Robert Sams with IBAN: GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and BIC/SWIFT: REVOGB21 The post HXS -v- persons unknown and others appeare[...]
: Claim No: KB-2026-002571 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 29 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Fordham Between: HSX -v- Daniel Ryan Kane Robert Samms Dylan Nelson The person or persons unknown (a) who have communicated with the Claimant by email from the email address dannyryan_94@hotmail.co.uk; or (b) who have communicated with the Claimant by ordinary text message from +1 917 722 9086; or (c) who has communicated with the Claimant by WhatsApp numbers +1 940 601 2821 and +44 7423 436872; or (d) who have communicated with the Claimant by Telegram accounts @edm2181 and @dg96dg; or (e) who have communicated with the Claimant via the Seeking dating website; or (f) who use or have used a Revolut account under the name Daniel Ryan with the GB IBAN GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and the BIC/SWIFT code REVOGB21; or (g) who use or have used the Wise bank account under the name Kane Robert Sams with IBAN: GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and BIC/SWIFT: REVOGB21 The post HSX -v- persons unknown and others appeare[...]
: We can’t go for that (no can do) lfair July 17, 2017 | 11:38AM We can’t go for that (no can do) By Lesley Fair Of course, phantom debt collection – the practice of pressuring people to pay “debts” they don’t owe – harms consumers. But as an FTC complaint demonstrates, when phantom debt collectors strike, they could affect your company, too. According to the FTC , a Florida-based outfit engaged in a scheme to defraud consumers through the collection of debts people didn’t actually owe or the company didn’t have the authority to collect. The complaint charges that the defendants – Hardco Holding Group, S & H Financial Group, Dequan M. Sicard, and Daryl M. Hall (no, not that Daryl Hall) – violated the FTC Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. When contacting consumers, in many instances the defendants allegedly impersonated attorneys and threatened to have people thrown in jail if they didn’t pay up on delinquent payday loans – loans, remember, that many consumers didn’t take out in the first place and de[...]