🕒

RSS JSON

strict invalidated court fourteenth compelling sffa based carolina were wrongs supreme under sufficiently harvard discrimination statistical race admissions equal law protection college that amendment fair clause var not university affirmative north universities president

2 Résultats (1 - 2)

🌍 SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[11/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review

🌍 SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[13/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review