🕒

RSS JSON

were compelling under that sufficiently college protection majority their invalidated president fair amendment strict inc equal survive supreme post statistical law university fellows universities var harvard wrongs affirmative action race not sffa north

2 Résultats (1 - 2)

🌍 SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[11/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review

🌍 SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[13/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review