🕒

RSS JSON

fair compelling were majority carolina sufficiently president supreme law invalidated clause appeared court admissions fourteenth university amendment not race that college protection statistical their wrongs equal affirmative north harvard universities sffa strict var

2 Résultats (1 - 2)

🌍 SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[11/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review

🌍 SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination (Harvard Law Review)

[13/5/2026] : In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review