Nouvelles.droit.org

🕒
RSS JSON
peoples purposes regulation evidentiary made exception grant morrill education campbell supreme fair use speech federal with social var act first universities media psychotherapist courts privilege land amendment users jaffee dangerous patient was its
5 Résultats (1 - 5)
A First Amendment Right to Know (Cornell Law Review)
: This Article tackles an increasingly important question: Can police round up people on American streets and keep secret the names of those they detain without violating the First Amendment? Alarmingly, the government made this very argument in the summer of 2020 when it sought to break up Black Lives Matter protests occurring in cities
Social Network as Work: A Labor Paradigm for Regulating Speech on Social Media (Cornell Law Review)
: Social media has eluded regulation by taking refuge in the First Amendment. The First Amendment, scholars and lawmakers overwhelmingly argue, is a formidable obstacle to regulation because social media facilitates the creation and exchange of speech by users. The received wisdom, therefore, characterizes users as consumers of a speech-related service, which inevitably does raise
#Landback to Indigenous Peoples from “Land-Grab” Universities (Cornell Law Review)
: The Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 (Morrill Act) was the first federal legislation to fund public higher education in the United States, funding fifty-two land-grant universities (LGUs) that still exist today. While the purpose of the Act was to “democratiz[e] . . . education” focusing on the study of agriculture and mechanical arts,
Campbell At 30: A Retrospective Appreciation (Cornell Law Review)
: This Article traces the intellectual history of copyright law’s fair use doctrine at the Supreme Court from its first encounter with fair use to its landmark decision slightly more than three decades ago in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Campbell provided courts with a coherent, user-centered theory for applying the four statutory fair use
An Empirical Examination of the Dangerous Patient Exception (Cornell Law Review)
: This Article empirically examines the effect of the dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege. The U.S. Supreme Court first recognized the psychotherapist-patient privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond. This evidentiary privilege prevents mental health professionals from testifying about confidential statements made by patients for the purposes of treatment. Since Jaffee, federal circuit courts