[{"id":2989548,"description":"* * * CaptionCitationPincite(s)Learning Res., Inc. v. Trump146 S. Ct. 628 (2026)683 n.2 (Thomas, J., dissenting); 684 (Thomas, J., dissenting)Trump v. CASA145 S. Ct.... The post Appendix to Montesquieu’s Day in Court: Recovering a Classical Understanding of Separated Powers appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Sun, 28 Jun 2026 08:28:37 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/montesquieus-day-in-court-appendix/","titre":"Appendix to Montesquieu’s Day in Court: Recovering a Classical Understanding of Separated Powers"},{"pubDate":"Thu, 21 May 2026 08:07:59 +0200","titre":"FTC Sends Warning Letters to Companies About Compliance with the TAKE IT DOWN Act","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/05/ftc-sends-warning-letters-companies-about-compliance-take-it-down-act","id":2896369,"description":"The Federal Trade Commission sent warning letters today to a dozen websites advising them of their obligation to comply with the TAKE IT DOWN Act (TIDA), which requires platforms to give people a way to request the removal of intimate photos or videos shared online without their consent, and to remove the intimate photos or videos within 48 hours of a valid request. “Today we’re demonstrating just how serious we are about protecting the public, especially children, from abusive online conduct,” said FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson. “Platforms no longer have any excuses—they must comply with their obligations under the TAKE IT DOWN Act or face the consequences.” The warning letters were sent to 12 companies that offer so-called “nudify” tools that allow people to take a clothed image of an individual and remove the individual’s clothing to create nonconsensual and sexualized images. The letters note that these companies appear to be in violation of TIDA by failing to provide individuals with a process through which victims can request the removal of nonconsensual intimate images appearing on their platforms. The letters urge the companies to “immediately come into compliance” with the law. Those that fail to do so could face legal action from the FTC, which could result in civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation. The FTC began enforcing the law on May 19. TIDA, which was championed by First Lady Melania Trump and signed into law by President Donald Trump in May 2025, gave businesses one year to come into compliance with the law’s requirements. Chairman Ferguson sent letters last week to major platforms— Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Automattic, Bumble, Discord, Match Group, Meta, Microsoft, Pinterest, Reddit, SmugMug, Snapchat, TikTok and X —reminding businesses of their obligation to comply fully with TIDA. The FTC also issued guidance for businesses about how to ensure they are complying with the","source":"Federal Trade Commission - Protecting America's Consumers"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 12 May 2026 08:07:00 +0200","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/05/ftc-chairman-ferguson-advises-companies-comply-take-it-down-act","titre":"FTC Chairman Ferguson Advises Companies to Comply with the Take It Down Act","id":2878537,"description":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson sent letters today to more than a dozen prominent technology companies reminding businesses of their obligation to comply fully with the Take It Down Act (TIDA) no later than May 19. Signed into law last year by President Donald J. Trump with the strong support of First Lady Melania Trump, TIDA requires covered platforms to establish a process allowing victims, including children, to request removal of intimate photos or videos shared without their consent.  The letters were sent to major platforms , including Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, Automattic, Bumble, Discord, Match Group, Meta, Microsoft, Pinterest, Reddit, SmugMug, Snapchat, TikTok and X. The letters state the definitions and requirements of the law, along with the penalties for non-compliance. “We stand ready to monitor compliance, investigate violations, and enforce the Take It Down Act,” said Chairman Ferguson. “Protecting the vulnerable—especially children—from this harmful abuse is a top priority for this agency and this administration. The Trump-Vance FTC is grateful for the First Lady’s leadership on the Take It Down Act and on children’s issues.”  The letter specifies that covered platforms must provide clear and conspicuous notice about the removal process. They must also take down the nonconsensual images, and all identical copies, within 48 hours of receiving a valid request. Under the law, “covered platforms” include various websites, apps and online services, such as social media, messaging, image or video sharing and gaming platforms. The FTC also has issued guidance about what companies should do as they prepare to comply with","source":"Federal Trade Commission - Protecting America's Consumers"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/keys-to-the-kingdom-immigration-control-and-the-accretion-of-executive-power/","titre":"Keys to the Kingdom: Immigration Control and the Accretion of Executive Power","pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:59 +0200","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"In his campaign for the presidency in 2024, then-candidate Donald Trump focused particular attention on immigration policy. Differentiating his proposed approach from that of the Biden Administration, Trump promised that if he were elected, he would “close the border” to migrants entering without authorization. The post Keys to the Kingdom: Immigration Control and the Accretion of Executive Power appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2877109},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2877110,"description":"Can habeas corpus cases proceed as class actions? The Supreme Court has never squarely answered that question, even in cases where lower courts certified habeas classes. But the Trump Administration’s wholesale push to expel noncitizens has forced the question to the center of modern civil rights litigation. The post Habeas Class Actions appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:59 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/habeas-class-actions/","titre":"Habeas Class Actions"},{"source":"Federal Trade Commission - Protecting America's Consumers","id":2826725,"description":"The Federal Trade Commission today announced it is seeking public comment on whether a rule is needed to address unfair or deceptive fee practices in connection with the services provided by online food and grocery delivery platforms nationwide. As detailed in an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to be published shortly in the Federal Register, the FTC is seeking written comments, including data, evidence, analyses, and arguments, to help determine how best to prevent unfair or deceptive acts or practices and to ensure that the agency addresses concerns from both consumers and industry. “Online grocery fees that are unclear, inconsistently disclosed, or revealed only at the last moment before consumers make a purchase distort competition and harm consumers,” said Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Clear and truthful pricing is essential to competitive markets. The Commission’s enforcement track record suggests that consumers continue to face a suite of fees that prevent them from making informed comparisons. The Trump-Vance FTC is committed to addressing unlawful grocery delivery pricing that obscures the true cost of groceries.” Unfair or deceptive fee practices violate the FTC Act. The Commission recently brought several actions against online food delivery platforms for unfair or deceptive practices that violated the FTC Act. For example, in December 2025, the FTC announced a $60 million settlement with  Instacart over allegations it falsely advertised “free delivery” on consumers’ first three orders on the platform and then charged them service fees that were not disclosed until checkout. And, in December 2024, the FTC obtained a $25 million settlement with  GrubHub over allegations it misled consumers about the cost of delivery on its platform. These cases illustrate that hidden and misleading fees and charges are a recurring problem related to online delivery platforms, despite enforcement actions to protect consumers’ interests. Also, while numerous states have recently adopted laws requiring food and grocery delivery platforms to more clearly disclose fees and include all mandatory fees in advertised prices, they have not adopted uniform rules that apply to all food delivery platforms across the country. The ANPRM asks the public to comment on whether a rule is needed to prevent unfair or deceptive fee practices in connection with online food delivery services including: Total Price. Do food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose the total price for food or grocery items ordered for local delivery or pickup? Fees and Charges. Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose the existence, nature, purpose, refundability, or recipient of any fees, charges, or other costs for a delivery or pickup order? Variable or Contingent Fees . Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose factors used to determine any fees, charges, or other costs that are variable or contingent on consumer selections, such as number or type of items bought or delivery location? Material Restrictions. Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose whether fees, charges, or other costs are mandatory or optional, or any material restrictions, limitations, or restrictions that may result in additional charges or that may diminish the consumer’s use of the good or service? Price Differentials. Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose whether the prices of items ordered are the same as, or different from, the prices of the same items offered in the store or restaurant? Personalized Pricing.  Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose whether the prices of items ordered are the same as, or different from, the prices of the same items offered to other consumers on the platform? Discounts or Promotions. Do online food delivery platforms clearly and conspicuously disclose material","pubDate":"Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:10:57 +0200","titre":"FTC Seeks Public Comment on Unfair and Deceptive Fee Practices in Online Food and Grocery Delivery Services","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/04/ftc-seeks-public-comment-unfair-deceptive-fee-practices-online-food-grocery-delivery-services"},{"titre":"White House Secures Corporate Governance Interest in the United States Steel Corporation","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/white-house-secures-corporate-governance-interest-in-the-united-states-steel-corporation/","pubDate":"Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:26:13 +0200","description":"President Trump is invoking new tools to bolster American economic and national security. His recent approval of Nippon Steel Corporation’s (Nippon Steel) acquisition of... The post White House Secures Corporate Governance Interest in the United States Steel Corporation appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2820491,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/construction-and-management-of-thesouth-florida-detention-facility/","titre":"Construction and Management of the South Florida Detention Facility","pubDate":"Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:37:56 +0100","description":"The second Trump Administration is executing an extensive immigration crackdown — pulling more people into detention, expanding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and funneling money from... The post Construction and Management of the South Florida Detention Facility appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2690609,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2629446,"description":"On March 15, 2025, the White House announced that President Trump had invoked an eighteenth-century wartime authority to order the summary removal of noncitizens who were believed to be members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.Proclamation No. 10,903, 90 Fed. Reg. 13033 (Mar. 14, 2025). The post Protecting Noncitizens’ Liberty When the Executive Seeks to Punish appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:49:11 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/protecting-noncitizens-liberty-when-the-executive-seeks-to-punish/","titre":"Protecting Noncitizens’ Liberty When the Executive Seeks to Punish"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"In Trump v. CASA, Inc., the Supreme Court held that federal courts may not issue “universal injunctions” unless “necessary to provide complete relief to... The post CASA’s Complete Relief Paradox appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2567811,"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/casas-complete-relief-paradox/","titre":"CASA’s Complete Relief Paradox","pubDate":"Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:05:22 +0100"},{"titre":"Clients Weigh in on Law Firm Responses to Trump Executive Orders","url":"https://bticonsulting.com/themadclientist/clients-weigh-in-on-law-firm-responses-to-trump-executive-orders","pubDate":"Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:29:31 +0200","description":"The post Clients Weigh in on Law Firm Responses to Trump Executive Orders appeared first on The BTI Consulting Group","id":2255300,"source":"The Mad Clientist The BTI Consulting"},{"id":2208210,"description":"Today, the FTC granted early termination of its review of Mars, Incorporated’s proposed acquisition of Kellanova. Mars is a global manufacturer of pet care, snacking, and food products. Kellanova owns legacy Kellogg brands, including in snacks, crackers, and frozen breakfasts, after spinning off its North American cereals business in 2023 as WK Kellogg Co. “The Commission cares deeply about any competition concerns that affect American consumers, including in food products,” said Daniel Guarnera, Director of the Bureau of Competition. “Commission staff closely reviewed every aspect of this transaction, including both specific product markets and potential portfolio effects from the acquisition. They turned over every stone needed to arrive at a robust assessment of the likely competitive effects of this transaction. After nearly a year of investigation, dozens upon dozens of interviews with non-parties at all levels of the supply chain (including large chains and small, independent businesses), extensive data analysis, sworn testimony from party witnesses, and the review of hundreds of thousands of documents, staff found that the evidence pointed in one direction: this transaction does not meet the standard for an anticompetitive merger set by Section 7 of the Clayton Act.” “In other countries, Mars and Kellanova offer different products than they do in the United States, and they face different market participants, consumer preferences, and shopping practices. Notably, Kellanova continues to sell breakfast cereal in other markets, including the European Union, that it does not sell in the United States,” continued Guarnera. “The Trump-Vance FTC takes an America First approach to antitrust enforcement. Our job is to protect competition and consumers in the United States. Our job is to determine whether there is a violation of American law that we can prove in court. And once we’ve concluded there is not, our job is to get out of the","source":"Federal Trade Commission Concurrence communiqués","pubDate":"Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:50:00 +0200","titre":"Statement on the Grant of Early Termination of the FTC’s Investigation of the Proposed Acquisition of Kellanova by Mars","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/06/statement-grant-early-termination-ftcs-investigation-proposed-acquisition-kellanova-mars"},{"source":"Federal Trade Commission Concurrence communiqués","id":2047232,"description":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson today congratulated Mark R. Meador on his confirmation to serve as an FTC Commissioner. “I am thrilled to welcome Mark to the Commission,” Chairman Ferguson said. “Mark is a brilliant antitrust lawyer who will be a great asset to the Trump-Vance FTC.” Meador was nominated on January 20, 2025 by President Trump to a term that will expire on September 25, 2031 and confirmed by the Senate on April 10, 2025. Meador most recently worked in private practice and as a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation Tech Policy Center. Prior to that, he served as Deputy Chief Counsel for Antitrust and Competition Policy for Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. During the first Trump Administration, Meador worked as a trial attorney in the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. He began his career as an attorney in the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. Meador earned his law degree from the University of Houston Law Center and his undergraduate degree in philosophy from the University of","pubDate":"Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:49:57 +0200","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/04/ftc-chairman-ferguson-congratulates-mark-meador-confirmation-ftc-commissioner","titre":"FTC Chairman Ferguson Congratulates Mark Meador on Confirmation as FTC Commissioner"},{"id":2013068,"description":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson today announced he has appointed Taylor C. Hoogendoorn as Deputy Director of the Bureau of Competition and Katherine White as Deputy Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection.  Hoogendoorn is a talented litigator with expertise in a wide range of litigation, including antitrust, tort, contractual, energy, and intellectual property matters. Hoogendoorn joins the FTC after spending time in private practice at a law firm in Houston. He clerked for the Hon. Samuel A. Alito Jr. on the Supreme Court of the United States; the Hon. Gregory G. Katsas on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; and the Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Hoogendoorn holds a J.D. from Yale Law School, where he won the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals and served on the Yale Law Journal, and a B.B.A. with majors in Economics, Finance, Mathematics, and Business Fellows from Baylor University. While at Baylor, he served on the university’s Board of Regents and graduated as the top-ranked student in the Hankamer School of Business. White is an experienced privacy and consumer protection attorney, with a career in both government service and private practice. White has deep experience in all aspects of consumer protection law and has led complex investigations relating to privacy, data security, and credit reporting. Most recently, White was a partner at a law firm. Prior to joining the firm, White spent nearly 15 years at the FTC and served in a variety of roles, including as an Attorney Advisor to former Commissioner Noah Phillips during the first Trump administration, Counsel to the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, and as a senior attorney in the Division of Privacy and Identity Protection. In addition, White worked on detail for the Senate Commerce Committee where she provided advice on a range of consumer protection issues. She is a graduate of the George Washington University Law School and the University of","source":"Federal Trade Commission Concurrence communiqués","pubDate":"Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:50:56 +0100","titre":"FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson Appoints Deputy Directors of the Bureaus of Competition and Consumer Protection","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/03/ftc-chairman-andrew-n-ferguson-appoints-deputy-directors-bureaus-competition-consumer-protection"},{"source":"The Mad Clientist The BTI Consulting","description":"The post CMOs Play Unexpected Roles in Trump v Big Law appeared first on The BTI Consulting Group","id":2012637,"url":"https://bticonsulting.com/themadclientist/cmos-play-unexpected-roles-in-trump-v-big-law","titre":"CMOs Play Unexpected Roles in Trump v Big Law","pubDate":"Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:28:53 +0100"},{"source":"Kluwer International Tax Blog","id":1925272,"description":"*This post was first published on the website of Maastricht University*   In recent weeks the tax world gave a lot of attention to how President Trump blew up some serious advancements in international tax law, long in the making. One of those advancements was the introduction of a minimum tax on profits of the... Continue","pubDate":"Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:29:54 +0100","url":"https://kluwertaxblog.com/2025/02/18/the-u-s-pushback-on-minimum-corporate-tax-rates-may-test-the-limits-of-bilateral-tax-treaties-with-eu-member-states/","titre":"The U.S. pushback on minimum corporate tax rates may test the limits of bilateral tax treaties with EU Member States"},{"titre":"FTC Chairman Ferguson Appoints Daniel Guarnera as Director of Bureau of Competition","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/02/ftc-chairman-ferguson-appoints-daniel-guarnera-director-bureau-competition","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:45:58 +0100","source":"Federal Trade Commission Concurrence communiqués","description":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson has appointed Daniel Guarnera as Director of the Bureau of Competition. “I am thrilled Dan is joining the FTC as Director of the Bureau of Competition,” said Chairman Ferguson. “He has tremendous experience litigating antitrust cases in critical markets, including agriculture and Big Tech. Few lawyers in America have as much experience taking on Big Tech as Dan. He also has experience using the antitrust laws to promote competition in labor and healthcare markets—two of my top priorities. Under Dan’s leadership, the Bureau of Competition will do its part to fulfill President Trump’s promise to lower the cost of living for all Americans, to promote innovation, and to protect the interests of American workers.” Guarnera joins the Commission from the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, where he served as chief of the Civil Conduct Task Force. During his tenure, the task force filed monopolization suits against Google and Apple, as well as multiple cases involving agriculture and labor markets. Prior to his role as chief, Guarnera participated in conduct and merger matters in industries such as transportation, healthcare, and technology, including as a trial attorney and counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division during the first Trump Administration. He previously served as special counsel to U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley during the confirmation of President Trump’s Supreme Court appointee, Justice Neil Gorsuch. He also worked in private practice and clerked for the Honorable Diane S. Sykes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Guarnera earned bachelor’s degrees in political science and French-European studies from American University and earned law and business administration degrees from the University of Virginia. The Commission vote approving Guarnera’s appointment as Director of the Bureau of Competition was","id":1905770},{"id":1879798,"description":"The post 3 Law Firm Outlooks on 2025 in Trump 2.0 appeared first on The BTI Consulting Group","source":"The Mad Clientist The BTI Consulting","pubDate":"Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:22:34 +0100","titre":"3 Law Firm Outlooks on 2025 in Trump 2.0","url":"https://bticonsulting.com/themadclientist/3-law-firm-outlooks-on-2025-in-trump-2-0"}]