[{"source":"Slaw","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/07/31/the-hidden-economics-of-the-vanishing-apprenticeship/","description":"Two columns ago, I followed the money through a law firm’s student recruitment program and found nearly $500,000 a year in lawyer time and expenses before a single billable hour was worked. Last column, I followed that same money into the delegation of actual work and found that firms were quietly losing much of it back through vague instructions, overworked memos, and write-downs nobody quite wants to talk about. This column follows that same money to where it gets spent – on the reps junior lawyers used to log before anyone trusted them with something that mattered. Those reps are . . . [more] The post The Hidden Economics of the Vanishing Apprenticeship appeared first on Slaw","titre":"The Hidden Economics of the Vanishing Apprenticeship","pubDate":"Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:00:27 +0200","id":3069027},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/sffa-and-the-wrong-of-race-based-statistical-discrimination/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2881848,"pubDate":"Wed, 13 May 2026 14:28:39 +0200","titre":"SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination","description":"In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/sffa-and-the-wrongs-of-race-based-statistical-discrimination/","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:59 +0200","id":2877108,"titre":"SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination","description":"In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"description":"Court proceedings put a premium on decorum and civil discourse, but the skills and dispositions that set the stage start long before the attorneys and parties enter the courtroom. That is why federal judges and attorneys collaborated with Duke Law School to bring the Judiciary’s Civil Discourse and Difficult Decisions program to law students for the first","titre":"Federal Judges Bring Civil Discourse Program to Law Students","pubDate":"Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:56:08 +0200","id":1232492,"source":"Judiciary News - United States Courts","url":"https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2023/12/12/federal-judges-bring-civil-discourse-program-law-students"}]