[{"source":"Scoop.it - Documentation juridique (Stéphan Cottin)","description":"Parliamentary institutions generate extensive, domain-specific legislative documents, including normative texts and parliamentary debate transcripts. These documents differ in content and linguistic complexity, making automatic summarization essential for producing coherent summaries aligned with institutional standards. While large language models (LLMs) achieve high summarization quality, their computational requirements limit deployment in parliamentary and public-sector environments. In contrast, small language models (SLMs) offer a more resource-efficient alternative, but their capabilities and performance relative to LLMs, extractive methods, and other SLMs remain underexplored. In this work, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of SLMs for legislative summarization, assessing their effectiveness across document types and languages. We use two complementary datasets: EUR-Lex-Sum, a multilingual corpus of normative texts covering six European languages, and ParcanDeb-Sum, a Spanish dataset of parliamentary debate records aligned with expert-written summaries. Summary quality is evaluated through a three-tier framework combining automatic metrics (ROUGE and BERTScore), LLM-based qualitative assessment, and expert-guided evaluation formalizing parliamentary debate summarization criteria. Our results show that: 1) instruction-tuned SLMs consistently outperform extractive baselines and, in several settings, rival LLMs with seven to eight billion parameters; 2) performance differs by document type, with fine-tuning being critical for debate transcripts, whereas instruction-tuning alone suffices for normative texts; and 3) for normative texts, SLMs establish a new benchmark for multilingual performance, while for parliamentary debates, fine-tuned SLMs achieve performance comparable to domain experts. These findings provide empirical evidence that high-quality legislative summarization can be achieved with SLMs, offering actionable guidance for selecting models that balance performance with computational constraints. Parliamentary institutions generate extensive, domain-specific legislative documents, including normative texts and parliamentary debate transcripts. These documents differ in content and linguistic complexity, making automatic summarization essential for producing coherent summaries aligned with institutional standards. While large language models (LLMs) achieve high summarization quality, their computational requirements limit deployment in parliamentary and public-sector environments. In contrast, small language models (SLMs) offer a more resource-efficient alternative, but their capabilities and performance relative to LLMs, extractive methods, and other SLMs remain underexplored. In this work, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of SLMs for legislative summarization, assessing their effectiveness across document types and languages. We use two complementary datasets: EUR-Lex-Sum, a multilingual corpus of normative texts covering six European languages, and ParcanDeb-Sum, a Spanish dataset of parliamentary debate records aligned with expert-written summaries. Summary quality is evaluated through a three-tier framework combining automatic metrics (ROUGE and BERTScore), LLM-based qualitative assessment, and expert-guided evaluation formalizing parliamentary debate summarization criteria. Our results show that: 1) instruction-tuned SLMs consistently outperform extractive baselines and, in several settings, rival LLMs with seven to eight billion parameters; 2) performance differs by document type, with fine-tuning being critical for debate transcripts, whereas instruction-tuning alone suffices for normative texts; and 3) for normative texts, SLMs establish a new benchmark for multilingual performance, while for parliamentary debates, fine-tuned SLMs achieve performance comparable to domain experts. These findings provide empirical evidence that high-quality legislative summarization can be achieved with SLMs, offering actionable guidance for selecting models that balance performance with","id":2841540,"url":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11460158","titre":"Small Language Models for Legislative Summarization: An Empirical Evaluation of Performance and Suitability","pubDate":"Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:44:53 +0200"},{"source":"Business Today","description":"Key Takeaways: Revolutionizing Business Education: The University of Huddersfield’s Breakthrough Partnership A New Era in Online Learning In a groundbreaking collaboration, the University of Huddersfield has joined forces with Coursera, a global leader in online education, to introduce an innovative MSc in Management program. This partnership marks a significant step in redefining how aspiring business leaders access top-tier education in an increasingly digital world. Flexibility Redefined: Performance-Based Admissions One of the key highlights of the University of Huddersfield-Coursera MSc in Management is its performance-based admissions approach. Unlike traditional programs, this online degree offers learners the opportunity to attempt an introductory The post Unveiling the Future of Business Education: A Game-Changing Online Degree You Need to Know About! appeared first on Business Today","id":1253870,"titre":"Unveiling the Future of Business Education: A Game-Changing Online Degree You Need to Know About!","url":"https://businesstoday.news/unveiling-the-future-of-business-education-a-game-changing-online-degree-you-need-to-know-about/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=unveiling-the-future-of-business-education-a-game-changing-online-degree-you-need-to-know-about","pubDate":"Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:36:24 +0200"}]