[{"source":"Nouvelles décisions : Cour d'appel fédérale","description":"Procedure — Class proceedings — Certification — Issue estoppel, functus officio — Motion to determine whether a fresh motion for certification may proceed — Remedial jurisdiction to re-open the certification motion — Preferable procedure and evidence “necessarily in issue” — Finality in the judicial system — Appeal dismissed Procedure — Res judicata — Issue estoppel — Danyluk conditions — Whether the first condition, the “same question”, was met — Preferable procedure and evidence required to establish it — “Distinctly put in issue and directly determined” and matters “necessarily determined” — Issue estoppel engaged — Appeal dismissed Procedure — Discretion — Setting aside issue estoppel — Whether discretion should be exercised due to material change in circumstances or new evidence — Reliance on alleged legislative and evidentiary changes in the CTA’s dispute resolution process — Potential injustice to class members weighed against finality — No palpable and overriding error — Appeal dismissed Evidence — Appeal — Fresh evidence — Palmer v. R., Barendregt v. Grebliunas — Whether criteria for admission of new evidence were met — Fairness and interests of justice — Attempt to remedy lack of evidence originally presented — Motion to admit fresh evidence dismissed Statutory interpretation — Federal Courts Rules — Continuing jurisdiction — Federal Courts Rules, Rules 385(1) and 334.2 — Whether Rules 385 and 334.2 override issue estoppel — Interpretation of Rules as a basis to bring a second certification motion — No conflation of functus officio and issue estoppel — Continuing jurisdiction rejected — Appeal","id":3169199,"titre":"Berenguer v. SATA Internacional - Azores Airlines, S.A, 2026 FCA 154 (CanLII)","url":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca154/2026fca154.html","pubDate":"Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:28:12 +0200"}]