[{"description":"By: Susannah Tredwell , Manager of Library Services at DLA Piper (Canada) LLP and James Bachmann , Instructional Librarian, Law Library, University of British Columbia Since 1988, when CALL/ACBD’s Copyright Committee was first set up, CALL/ACBD has advocated for its members' interests in the area of copyright. While the primary focus of CALL/ACBD’s copyright advocacy over the last few years has been on Crown copyright and primary law, CALL/ACBD has also made submissions about such areas as fair dealing and licencing. CALL/ACBD sees this work as not only supporting the needs of its members but also as serving the interests of access to justice as a whole. Continuing this work, on January 18, 2022 CALL/ACBD, along with Library Futures Institute, will act as an intervener in the Supreme Court of Canada case Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, et al. v. Entertainment Software Association, et al.   Kim Nayyer, CALL/ACBD’s President, and Robert Janes of JFK Law   will be representing CALL/ACBD and Library Futures. This case addresses the question of how the concepts of “communication to the public by telecommunication” and “making available on demand” as used in the Copyright Act should be understood. The outcome of this case has the potential to significantly impact various library activities, including controlled digital lending and possibly even the simple use of hyperlinks, particularly in light of the limited scope of current library and education exceptions in the Copyright Act . CALL/ACBD's submitted that the court refrain from broadly construing the terms “making available” and “Communication to the Public by Telecommunication” and that s. 2.4(1.1) of the act (\"Communication to the public by telecommunication\")   does not need to be understood as creating a new right.   You can find CALL/ACBD’s intervener's factum at https://www.scc-csc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/39418/FM050_Intervener_Canadian-Association-Law-Libraries-et-al.pdf . The other factums in this case are available at https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/af-ma-eng.aspx?cas=39418 .  CALL/ACBD has acted as an intervener at the Supreme Court of Canada on two other occasions. In Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc. , which looked at Crown copyright, CALL/ACBD submitted   that “s. 12 Crown copyright does not extend to primary sources of law”. In York University v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency  (\"Access Copyright\"), CALL/ACBD submitted   that the SCC “should resist the temptation to modify or clarify the existing fair dealing test” stating that the existing test “is a flexible multifactorial test that allows libraries (and other institutions) to tailor access and appropriate copying policies that consider all relevant circumstances.” CALL/ACBD also made submissions to the 2018 review of the Copyright Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42: one general submission   and <a","id":3241460,"source":"Canadian Association of Law Libraries / L'Association canadienne des bibliothèques de droit CALL/ACBD Blog","titre":"Canadian Association of Law Libraries Intervention in Upcoming Supreme Court of Canada Copyright Case","url":"https://www.callacbd.ca/CALL-Blog/12242053","pubDate":"Mon, 26 Oct 2026 07:55:47 +0100"},{"titre":"$88 million back for AT&T customers: An inside look at a refund program","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2016/12/88-million-back-att-customers-inside-look-refund-program","pubDate":"Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:05:06 +0200","source":"FTC USA Business Blog Posts","description":"$88 million back for AT&T customers: An inside look at a refund program lfair December 8, 2016 | 11:15AM $88 million back for AT&T customers: An inside look at a refund program By Lesley Fair Chances are that you or someone you know will be among 2.7 million AT&T Mobility customers who will be getting a refund soon. The FTC is returning a total of $88 million to people who were billed for premium text message services they didn’t authorize. But even if the settlement doesn’t directly benefit you as a consumer, it offers insights for business people about the steps the FTC takes to get refunds back to consumers – and the seriousness with which we approach that stewardship role. The FTC settlement was part of a joint action with the FCC and Attorneys General from all 50 states and the District of Columbia to crack down on mobile cramming. The FTC alleged that third parties placed unauthorized charges for trivia, horoscopes, celebrity tidbits, etc., on the phone bills of AT&T customers with AT&T pocketing a sizeable chunk of the take – 35% or more. A portion of the $105 million was paid in the form of penalties to the states and the FCC. The remaining funds – initially, $80 million – were earmarked for a consumer refund program administered by the FTC. But a program of that size isn’t just a matter of cutting a quick check. There are required procedures to make sure the money is returned to eligible consumers. Step #1: The FTC hired a refund administrator to manage the complicated logistics. During the 6-month period in which consumers could file refund applications, we received more than 5 million claims from AT&T customers. (Some people submitted more than one claim.) Next, the refund administrator went over every single claim to make sure it was valid. The process was painstaking, but it was essential for maintaining the integrity of the refund program. Then came the complicated calculation of how the funds should be distributed. Some good news was that the FTC was able to add more money to the initial $80 million amount through assets recovered in related law enforcement actions against Tatto and Acquinity, third parties that added charges to consumers’ AT&T bills. In addition, the court required that an independent auditor review each step of the process – another important double-check to make sure the i’s are dotted and the t’s crossed. Once the auditor approved the final plan, the refund administrator prepared and printed checks and letters. What’s next?  Current AT&T customers should see a credit on their bill within 75 days. Former AT&T customers will receive a check, the first round of which were mailed today. If you get a check, be sure to cash it within 60 days. (By the way, the FTC never requires people to pay money or turn over their account information to cash refund checks.) Questions? Call the refund administrator at 1-877-819-9692 or visit ftc.gov/att.","id":3201874},{"description":"As a supplement to our Sunday Summary each month, Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa presents Supreme One-Liners, a super-short descriptive guide to the most recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers its more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter , summarizing all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted. Leaves to Appeal Granted Arbitration: Same-Issue Estoppel; Standard of Review Vancouver School District No. 39 v. Kingsgate Property Ltd., et al., 2026 BCCA 98 (42350) Same-issue estoppel & standard of review in arbitration context. Family Law: Common Law Relationships Tanguay v. Zicat, 2025 QCCA . . . [more] The post Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners appeared first on Slaw","id":3182015,"source":"Slaw","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/09/27/summaries-sunday-supreme-one-liners-48/","titre":"Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners","pubDate":"Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:00:14 +0200"},{"pubDate":"Mon, 03 Aug 2026 07:57:47 +0200","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/08/02/summaries-sunday-supreme-one-liners-44/","titre":"Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners","id":3072554,"description":"As a supplement to our Sunday Summary each month, Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa presents Supreme One-Liners, a super-short descriptive guide to the most recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers its more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter , summarizing all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted. Appeals Constitutional Law/Courts: Review of Delegated Powers Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28 (41576) Clarifications re courts’ jurisdiction as to legality of delegated power exercise. Civil Litigation: Spoliation of Evidence SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp . . . [more] The post Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners appeared first on Slaw","source":"Slaw"},{"source":"Slaw","id":3055462,"description":"As a supplement to our Sunday Summary each month, Supreme Advocacy LLP in Ottawa presents Supreme One-Liners, a super-short descriptive guide to the most recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Advocacy LLP offers its more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter, Supreme Advocacy Letter , summarizing all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted. Appeals Real Property: Riparian Rights Zardev Inc. v. Dydzak, 2026 SCC 27 (41291) Clarifications re riparian rights, submerged lots, accessories. Leave to Appeal Granted Administrative Law/Police: Mandamus Royal Canadian Mounted Police External Review Committee, et al. v. Benison, et al ., 2026 FCA 53 . . . [more] The post Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners appeared first on Slaw","pubDate":"Mon, 27 Jul 2026 07:57:56 +0200","titre":"Summaries Sunday: Supreme One-Liners","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/07/26/summaries-sunday-supreme-one-liners-43/"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"* * * CaptionCitationPincite(s)Learning Res., Inc. v. Trump146 S. Ct. 628 (2026)683 n.2 (Thomas, J., dissenting); 684 (Thomas, J., dissenting)Trump v. CASA145 S. Ct.... The post Appendix to Montesquieu’s Day in Court: Recovering a Classical Understanding of Separated Powers appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2989548,"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/montesquieus-day-in-court-appendix/","titre":"Appendix to Montesquieu’s Day in Court: Recovering a Classical Understanding of Separated Powers","pubDate":"Sun, 28 Jun 2026 08:28:37 +0200"},{"titre":"Some Realism About Constitutional Remedies","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/some-realism-about-constitutional-remedies/","pubDate":"Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:30:31 +0200","description":"Introduction The Supreme Court has wavered between two approaches to questions of executive power, which are often labeled institutional formalism and realism. Formalism treats... The post Some Realism About Constitutional Remedies appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2947231,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"pubDate":"Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:30:31 +0200","titre":"The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons in Judicial Self-Protection","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/the-supreme-court-under-threat-early-lessons-in-judicial-self-protection/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2947234,"description":"Because the Supreme Court is powerful, it is largely able to fulfill its legal responsibilities. Because it is a court — because it lacks both the... The post The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons in Judicial Self-Protection appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"pubDate":"Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:30:31 +0200","titre":"Remedies for a Constitutional Crisis","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/remedies-for-a-constitutional-crisis/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2947235,"description":"Introduction In a constitutional showdown with the executive branch, the courts may seem to have limited remedial options. Once we reach a point where... The post Remedies for a Constitutional Crisis appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2881848,"description":"In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Wed, 13 May 2026 14:28:39 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/sffa-and-the-wrong-of-race-based-statistical-discrimination/","titre":"SFFA and the Wrong of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination"},{"pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:59 +0200","titre":"SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/sffa-and-the-wrongs-of-race-based-statistical-discrimination/","id":2877108,"description":"In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. (SFFA), the Supreme Court invalidated the race-based affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The SFFA majority held that the programs could not survive strict scrutiny: The universities’ interests in their affirmative action programs were not sufficiently compelling... The post SFFA and the Wrongs of Race-Based Statistical Discrimination appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:59 +0200","titre":"Habeas Class Actions","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/habeas-class-actions/","id":2877110,"description":"Can habeas corpus cases proceed as class actions? The Supreme Court has never squarely answered that question, even in cases where lower courts certified habeas classes. But the Trump Administration’s wholesale push to expel noncitizens has forced the question to the center of modern civil rights litigation. The post Habeas Class Actions appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:58 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/hunt-v-richmond-police-department/","titre":"Hunt v. Richmond Police Department","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2877104,"description":"Justice Gorsuch, writing for the majority in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, made two bold immunity claims: that state court judges possess sovereign immunity... The post Hunt v. Richmond Police Department appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"titre":"Redefining Organized Labor: How the Supreme Court Circumscribed the Role of Private Sector Unions in American Communities","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/redefining-organized-labor-how-the-supreme-court-circumscribed-the-role-of-private-sector-unions-in-american-communities/","pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:58 +0200","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"Organized labor is in crisis. Despite recent polling showing higher levels of public support for unions than at any time since the 1960s, the... The post Redefining Organized Labor: How the Supreme Court Circumscribed the Role of Private Sector Unions in American Communities appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2877105},{"description":"The Supreme Court promises that government action is illegitimate if it “lack[s] any purpose other than a ‘bare . . . desire to harm a politically unpopular group.’”... The post Presidential Speech and the Discrimination Paradox appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2877106,"source":"Harvard Law Review","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/presidential-speech-and-the-discrimination-paradox/","titre":"Presidential Speech and the Discrimination Paradox","pubDate":"Mon, 11 May 2026 14:25:58 +0200"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/introduction-11/","titre":"Introduction","pubDate":"Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:26:14 +0200","description":"Lockstepping’s critics have increasingly found their voice in the courts. State constitutions are unique documents, with their own histories, texts, and procedures. But often,... The post Introduction appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2820498,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"id":2820492,"description":"Lifetime sex offender registration statutes are common across the states, and several state supreme courts have reached conflicting results in analyzing the constitutionality of... The post State ex rel. D.D. appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:26:13 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/state-ex-rel-d-d/","titre":"State ex rel. D.D."},{"id":2750226,"description":"Introduction On August 23, 1842, Congress quietly and quickly conferred a broad grant of rulemaking authority on the Supreme Court. The Act of Aug.... The post Making the Rules of the Rules of the Game: The Use, Misuse, and Disuse of the Rulemaking Grant in the Act of 1842 appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:26:08 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/making-the-rules-of-the-rules-of-the-game-the-use-misuse-and-disuse-of-the-rulemaking-grant-in-the-act-of-1842/","titre":"Making the Rules of the Rules of the Game: The Use, Misuse, and Disuse of the Rulemaking Grant in the Act of 1842"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/liberty-of-conscience-political-process-theory-and-founding-era-free-exercise/","titre":"Liberty of Conscience, Political Process Theory, and Founding-Era Free Exercise","pubDate":"Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:26:08 +0100","description":"Religious freedom claimants have achieved tremendous success before the Supreme Court in recent years. Yet free exercise jurisprudence has bounced between skepticism and embrace... The post Liberty of Conscience, Political Process Theory, and Founding-Era Free Exercise appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2750228,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"description":"At some point, less than two decades after the United States Supreme Court found racial segregation in the public schools to be unconstitutional, the... The post Blown Chances appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2750229,"source":"Harvard Law Review","titre":"Blown Chances","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/blown-chances/","pubDate":"Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:26:08 +0100"},{"pubDate":"Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:26:07 +0100","titre":"Fulton v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/fulton-v-fulton-county-board-of-commissioners/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2750221,"description":"“[W]here there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy . . . .” Although Blackstone’s maxim has led to efforts to redress constitutional violations, courts... The post Fulton v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court failed to fully clarify the “unquestionably muddy” relationship between Article III and the Seventh Amendment. Yet it... The post Sun Valley Orchards, LLCv. United States Department of Labor appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2750223,"titre":"Sun Valley Orchards, LLCv. United States Department of Labor","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/sun-valley-orchards-llcv-united-states-department-of-labor/","pubDate":"Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:26:07 +0100"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2690614,"description":"The Digital Fourth Amendment is written by Professor Orin Kerr, one of the country’s foremost authorities on the Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy, and criminal procedure. Kerr’s work has been deeply influential in shaping how courts are looking at and deciding issues raised by law enforcement’s powerful and novel capabilities, thanks to technological changes. The post Fourth Amendment Equilibrium Adjustment in an Age of Technological Upheaval appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:37:57 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/fourth-amendment-equilibrium-adjustment-in-an-age-of-technological-upheaval/","titre":"Fourth Amendment Equilibrium Adjustment in an Age of Technological Upheaval"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2690610,"description":"The Supreme Court has long declared itself “supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution.” But that does not leave the state... The post People v. Thompson appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:37:56 +0100","titre":"People v. Thompson","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/people-v-thompson/"},{"titre":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson Appoints Deputy Director for Bureau of Consumer Protection","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/federal-trade-commission-chairman-andrew-n-ferguson-appoints-deputy-director-bureau-consumer","pubDate":"Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:46:37 +0100","source":"Federal Trade Commission - Protecting America's Consumers","description":"Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson has appointed Levi Swank as Deputy Director of the agency’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.  Swank is an experienced consumer protection litigator who has represented clients in a wide variety of enforcement matters, class actions, and investigations. Prior to joining the FTC, Swank had spent his career in private practice at a large law firm in Washington, D.C., first as an associate and then as a partner. Swank holds a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he was an Executive Editor of the Virginia Law Review and graduated Order of the Coif. He also holds a B.A. in Government from Patrick Henry College. Following law school, Swank clerked for the Hon. Alice M. Batchelder of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth","id":2667062},{"id":2629441,"description":"Courts often consult entrenched, preratification sources such as Blackstone’s Commentaries and The Digest of Justinian when rendering decisions in common law actions. These authorities... The post Elam v. Early appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:49:11 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/elam-v-early/","titre":"Elam v. Early"},{"titre":"Dormancy and Delaware: An Emerging Threat to the Internal Affairs Doctrine","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/dormancy-and-delaware-an-emerging-threat-to-the-internal-affairs-doctrine/","pubDate":"Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:49:11 +0100","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"A longstanding choice-of-law rule known as the internal affairs doctrine has predominated over corporate law matters in the United States since at least the 1860s. Acknowledged by the Supreme Court and generally followed by the states, the doctrine holds that the internal affairs of a corporation are governed by the law of the state where it is incorporated, notwithstanding where it may be headquartered. The post Dormancy and Delaware: An Emerging Threat to the Internal Affairs Doctrine appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2629444},{"id":2567810,"description":"Bankruptcy courts occupy an odd place in the judicial system. In Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution guarantees parties in... The post Excluded Lenders v. Serta Simmons Bedding, L.L.C. appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:05:22 +0100","titre":"Excluded Lenders v. Serta Simmons Bedding, L.L.C.","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/excluded-lenders-v-serta-simmons-beddingl-l-c/"},{"pubDate":"Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:05:22 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/casas-complete-relief-paradox/","titre":"CASA’s Complete Relief Paradox","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2567811,"description":"In Trump v. CASA, Inc., the Supreme Court held that federal courts may not issue “universal injunctions” unless “necessary to provide complete relief to... The post CASA’s Complete Relief Paradox appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"In recent years, the Supreme Court has developed the “major questions doctrine,” an interpretive presumption that Congress must speak clearly before delegating to an... The post The Compatibility of Substantive Canons and Originalism appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2567812,"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/the-compatibility-of-substantive-canons-and-originalism/","titre":"The Compatibility of Substantive Canons and Originalism","pubDate":"Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:05:22 +0100"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2567816,"description":"Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.* In a bench statement delivered when the Supreme Court convened on May 9, 2025, Chief Justice Roberts offered... The post In Memoriam: Justice David H. Souter appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:05:22 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/in-memoriam-justice-david-h-souter/","titre":"In Memoriam: Justice David H. Souter"},{"description":"Brussels, 17 November - The EDPB organises a remote event to collect  stakeholders’ input on anonymisation and pseudonymisation on implications of the judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in EDPS v Single Resolution Board (SRB) . The event will take place on 12 December 2025 (time to be confirmed). This will be an opportunity to inform and support the EDPB’s ongoing work on these topics as per its work programme 2024-2025 and it reflects the EDPB’s commitment to stakeholder engagement, as outlined in the recent Helsinki statement .   Who can participate? Individuals representing sector associations, organisations or NGOs and individual companies, law firms or academics are invited to express their interest to participate in this event (one participant per organisation). The EDPB encourages all organisations interested in this matter to delegate a representative with technical knowledge of these topics. As a general rule, participants will be registered on a first-come first-served basis. Nonetheless, the EDPB reserves the right to give precedence to specific stakeholders among those who expressed their interest, based on their relevance to the topics of the event, and to ensure diversity of views and a balanced representation of areas of interest, as well as geographical balance. How to take part? You can find further information and the instructions on how to register (link not available). The call will be closed as soon as a sufficiently high number of applicants is reached with a view to ensuring the participation of a maximum number of stakeholders. If you have technical problems submitting the application, we invite you to refresh the page or open the form in a different browser.    Update on 17/11/2025, 12:57 pm: The call is now closed. Thank you to all those who expressed their interest in taking part in the EDPB stakeholder event on ‘anonymisation and pseudonymisation’. We will carefully review all applications and communicate the results of the process to those who applied in the coming weeks.","id":2548822,"source":"EDPB News","titre":"Stakeholder event on anonymisation and pseudonymisation: express your interest","url":"https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2025/stakeholder-event-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation-express-your-interest_en","pubDate":"Wed, 03 Dec 2025 15:56:01 +0100"},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2497794,"description":"In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a state law that prohibits transgender minors from accessing gender-affirming care. The post Skrmetti Beyond Scrutiny appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:47 +0100","titre":"Skrmetti Beyond Scrutiny","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/skrmetti-beyond-scrutiny/"},{"description":"If the Warren Court reflected nearly twenty years of jurisprudence dismantling ugly systems of oppression and institutional injustice that embedded invidious practices and policies into American law and society... The post Medina v. Planned Parenthood: The Supreme Court’s Making of the New Jane Crow appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2497795,"source":"Harvard Law Review","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/medina-v-planned-parenthood-the-supreme-courts-making-of-the-new-jane-crow/","titre":"Medina v. Planned Parenthood: The Supreme Court’s Making of the New Jane Crow","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:47 +0100"},{"description":"Article III protects federal judges with life tenure and salary guarantees. But politics still impacts federal courts, especially the Supreme Court. The post Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2497796,"source":"Harvard Law Review","titre":"Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/interim-orders-the-presidency-and-judicial-supremacy/","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:47 +0100"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:47 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/to-a-conservative-warren-court/","titre":"To a Conservative Warren Court","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2497797,"description":"The Warren Court’s legacy is ubiquitous. With the eponymous Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the Supreme Court featured a strong majority of left-of-center jurists, and those “liberal lions” ruled (or roared) accordingly. The post To a Conservative Warren Court appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:47 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/appendix-for-fuld-v-palestine-liberation-organization/","titre":"Appendix for Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization","id":2497798,"description":"This is the Appendix to The Supreme Court, 2024 Term — Leading Cases: Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, 139 Harv. L. Rev. 302 (2025). The post Appendix for Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"titre":"Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/free-speech-coalition-inc-v-paxton/","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:46 +0100","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"The Supreme Court has consistently confirmed that nonobscene sexually explicit content is First Amendment–protected expression. It has treated this sexually explicit content the same... The post Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2497791},{"source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2497793,"description":"A revolution has occurred in the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Supreme Court has greatly expanded the scope of the Free Exercise Clause. The post The Structure of Religious Preference appeared first on Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Nov 2025 16:06:46 +0100","titre":"The Structure of Religious Preference","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/the-structure-of-religious-preference/"},{"id":2463184,"description":"This is the Appendix to Jack Goldsmith, The Supreme Court, 2024 Term — Comment: Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy, 139 Harv. L. Rev. 86... The post Appendix for Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Sun, 26 Oct 2025 16:08:55 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/appendix-for-interim-orders-the-presidency-and-judicial-supremacy/","titre":"Appendix for Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy"},{"description":"Today, the FTC granted early termination of its review of Mars, Incorporated’s proposed acquisition of Kellanova. Mars is a global manufacturer of pet care, snacking, and food products. Kellanova owns legacy Kellogg brands, including in snacks, crackers, and frozen breakfasts, after spinning off its North American cereals business in 2023 as WK Kellogg Co. “The Commission cares deeply about any competition concerns that affect American consumers, including in food products,” said Daniel Guarnera, Director of the Bureau of Competition. “Commission staff closely reviewed every aspect of this transaction, including both specific product markets and potential portfolio effects from the acquisition. They turned over every stone needed to arrive at a robust assessment of the likely competitive effects of this transaction. After nearly a year of investigation, dozens upon dozens of interviews with non-parties at all levels of the supply chain (including large chains and small, independent businesses), extensive data analysis, sworn testimony from party witnesses, and the review of hundreds of thousands of documents, staff found that the evidence pointed in one direction: this transaction does not meet the standard for an anticompetitive merger set by Section 7 of the Clayton Act.” “In other countries, Mars and Kellanova offer different products than they do in the United States, and they face different market participants, consumer preferences, and shopping practices. Notably, Kellanova continues to sell breakfast cereal in other markets, including the European Union, that it does not sell in the United States,” continued Guarnera. “The Trump-Vance FTC takes an America First approach to antitrust enforcement. Our job is to protect competition and consumers in the United States. Our job is to determine whether there is a violation of American law that we can prove in court. And once we’ve concluded there is not, our job is to get out of the","id":2208210,"source":"Federal Trade Commission Concurrence communiqués","titre":"Statement on the Grant of Early Termination of the FTC’s Investigation of the Proposed Acquisition of Kellanova by Mars","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/06/statement-grant-early-termination-ftcs-investigation-proposed-acquisition-kellanova-mars","pubDate":"Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:50:00 +0200"},{"pubDate":"Thu, 12 Jun 2025 10:06:44 +0200","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/codify-gardner/","titre":"Codify Gardner","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":2175056,"description":"The Gardner presumption, also known as the pro-veteran canon, is a substantive canon of interpretation named after the Supreme Court case Brown v. Gardner. The canon instructs courts to construe ambiguous statutes concerning veterans’ benefits in favor of the veteran. While the canon today rarely acts as a tiebreaker, it has historically represented a strong congressional intent to care for veterans. The post Codify Gardner appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/the-forgotten-history-of-prison-law-judicial-oversight-of-detention-facilities-in-the-nations-early-years/","titre":"The Forgotten History of Prison Law: Judicial Oversight of Detention Facilities in the Nation’s Early Years","pubDate":"Thu, 15 May 2025 15:55:45 +0200","description":"Prison law is characterized by judicial deference to penal administrators. Despite the well-documented horrors that occur behind prison walls, federal and state courts often decline to intervene, asserting, among other things, that prisoners’ rights are limited and that the judicial branch lacks the power and expertise to get involved in the inner workings of detention facilities. Moreover, jurists often assume that the nation’s first courts largely stayed out of prisons and jails, and contemporary judicial deference is therefore historically rooted. The post The Forgotten History of Prison Law: Judicial Oversight of Detention Facilities in the Nation’s Early Years appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":2117263,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"titre":"Banking Liability and Interruption of Prescription in Belgian Law: Lessons from a Court of Appeal Decision","url":"https://bankinglaw.be/en/banking-liability-and-interruption-of-prescription-in-belgian-law-lessons-from-a-court-of-appeal-decision/","pubDate":"Tue, 01 Apr 2025 15:36:55 +0200","source":"Droit bancaire et financier en Belgique","description":"A decision by the Mons Court of Appeal[1] allowed us to review the notion of interruption of prescription, a fundamental principle in Belgian civil law. This case illustrates the rules applicable to the starting point of prescription and the conditions necessary to interrupt it. The Starting Point of Prescription in Belgian Law In contractual matters, the... Continue Reading → The post Banking Liability and Interruption of Prescription in Belgian Law: Lessons from a Court of Appeal Decision appeared first on Banking and Finance law in Belgium","id":2025081},{"source":"Droit bancaire et financier en Belgique","description":"A decision by the Mons Court of Appeal[1] allowed us to review the notion of interruption of prescription, a fundamental principle in Belgian civil law. This case illustrates the rules applicable to the starting point of prescription and the conditions necessary to interrupt it. The Starting Point of Prescription in Belgian Law In contractual matters, the... Continue Reading → The post Banking Liability and Interruption of Prescription in Belgian Law: Lessons from a Court of Appeal Decision appeared first on Banking and Financial law in Belgium","id":2023805,"url":"https://bankinglaw.be/banking-liability-and-interruption-of-prescription-in-belgian-law-lessons-from-a-court-of-appeal-decision/","titre":"Banking Liability and Interruption of Prescription in Belgian Law: Lessons from a Court of Appeal Decision","pubDate":"Tue, 01 Apr 2025 09:38:43 +0200"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/without-remedies-the-destructive-effect-of-cummings-and-the-contract-law-analogy-on-antidiscrimination-spending-clause-plaintiffs/","titre":"Without Remedies: The Effect of Cummings and the Contract Law Analogy on Antidiscrimination Spending Clause Plaintiffs","pubDate":"Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:34:19 +0100","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"It has become increasingly difficult for civil rights plaintiffs to vindicate their rights in federal court. Barriers to successful lawsuits are plentiful. Qualified immunity... The post Without Remedies: The Effect of Cummings and the Contract Law Analogy on Antidiscrimination Spending Clause Plaintiffs appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":1996119},{"titre":"People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tabak","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/people-for-the-ethical-treatment-of-animals-v-tabak-109-f-4th-627-d-c-cir-2024/","pubDate":"Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:53:26 +0100","description":"How to regulate speech on social media platforms has been the subject of vigorous debate and recent Supreme Court opinions. In particular, government agencies... The post People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tabak appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":1995001,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"titre":"Federalism Rebalancing and the Roberts Court: A Departure from Historical Patterns","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/no-volume/federalism-rebalancing-and-the-roberts-court-a-departure-from-historical-patterns/","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:33:55 +0100","source":"Harvard Law Review","description":"One of the early lessons we learn in life is that things seek balance. When a parent pushes their child on a swing set,... The post Federalism Rebalancing and the Roberts Court: A Departure from Historical Patterns appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":1973595},{"pubDate":"Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:33:55 +0100","titre":"Does the Twenty-First Amendment Displace Pike Balancing?","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/does-the-twenty-first-amendment-displace-pike-balancing/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":1973596,"description":"Absent alcohol, dormant commerce clause doctrine is mostly familiar. Courts use strict scrutiny when state laws discriminate — facially, in purpose, or in effect — against... The post Does the Twenty-First Amendment Displace Pike Balancing? appeared first on Harvard Law Review"},{"id":1972465,"description":"There has been increased skepticism of sexual harassment claims, both in the public sphere and in the courts. Recently, in Anderson v. Mott Street,... The post Anderson v. Mott Street, 104 F.4th 646 (7th Cir. 2024) appeared first on Harvard Law Review","source":"Harvard Law Review","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:38:07 +0100","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/anderson-v-mott-street-104-f-4th-646-7th-cir-2024/","titre":"Anderson v. Mott Street, 104 F.4th 646 (7th Cir. 2024)"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:42:44 +0100","titre":"Bias Baked In: How Antisocial Personality Disorder Diagnoses Trigger Legal Failure","url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/bias-baked-in-how-antisocial-personality-disorder-diagnoses-trigger-legal-failure/","source":"Harvard Law Review","id":1905859,"description":"In 1927, a Supreme Court of Nebraska opinion quoted testimony from the physician who examined capital defendant Frank Carter: “[H]e belonged to a type... The post Bias Baked In: How Antisocial Personality Disorder Diagnoses Trigger Legal Failure appeared first on Harvard Law Review"}]