[{"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","id":3252063,"description":"Neutral citation number: [2026] EWCA Civ 1368 Case number: CA-2025-001467 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court in Leeds Date: 29 October 2026 Before: Lady Justice Asplin Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing Between: R (on the application of TJ Trading Express Limited) and Secretary of State for the Home Department The post R (on the application of TJ Trading Express Limited) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","pubDate":"Fri, 30 Oct 2026 08:02:08 +0100","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-on-the-application-of-tj-trading-express-limited-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department/","titre":"R (on the application of TJ Trading Express Limited) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department"},{"titre":"LC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (anonymity order)","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/lc-v-secretary-of-state-for-work-and-pensions-anonymity-order/","pubDate":"Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:01:50 +0100","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","description":"UT ref: UA-2026-000083-PIP In the Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber 28 October 2026 Before: Stewart Wright Judge of the Upper Tribunal Between: LC -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Anonymity Order Appellant: LC Respondents: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Tribunal: First tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) Tribunal venue: Scarborough Tribunal Case Nos: SC231/24/00181 Tribunal decision date: 29 August 2025 NOTICE: Any breach of this order is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum punishment that may be imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine. It is ordered , under rule 14(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal Rules) 2008, that, without the permission of this Tribunal, no one shall disclose or publish the name, or any part of the address, of the appellant in these proceedings or publish or reveal any other information that would be likely to lead to the identification of the appellant. The appellant shall be known as LC. Anyone who objects to this order may apply to the Upper Tribunal for it to be varied or set aside. A copy of this Order shall be published on the website of the Judiciary of England and Wales. REASONS This anonymity order is made on the application of the appellant. It is sought because “the appeal involves a disabled claimant and details of their disability are to reasonably be inferred from a prospectively publicised decision”. I have by a separate decision allowed the appellant’s appeal to the Upper Tribunal. That decision will be published on public facing websites and, if no anonymity order is made, the appellant would be named in that decision. The principle of open justice is of fundamental importance to the justice system. An aspect of open justice is that parties’ names are made public. Derogation from this principle requires justification. Particular regard must be given to the importance of the right to freedom of expression, including the right to publish reports of cases. In this case, I am satisfied that it is necessary to derogate from the open justice principle to the limited extent of not naming the appellant. The appellant has ADHD and anxiety and depression and those features of his health and conditions need to be referred to in the decision on the appeal. In that context, I am satisfied that an anonymity order should be made because I accept a risk of harm could arise for this vulnerable appellant if he was to be identified in these proceedings, because those health details would then be in the public domain. The public interest in open justice and freedom of expression will still be served by this order and the final decision in this appeal being published online. The letters LC are not the appellant’s initials. The post LC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (anonymity order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3248599},{"description":"Case No: CA-2025-002755 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on Appeal from the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Date: 22 October 2026 Before: Lord Justice Baker Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Butcher Between: The King (on the application of CKT and DGT (by his mother and litigation friend CKT) -v- (1) Twyford Church of England Academies Trust (2) Admissions Panel of Twyford Church of England High School (3) London Diocesan Board for Schools (4) Secretary of State for Education – and – The King (on the application of CKT) -v- (1) Office of the Schools Adjudicator (2) Secretary of State for Education The post CKT and DGT -v- Twyford Church of England Academies Trust appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3237209,"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/ckt-and-dgt-v-twyford-church-of-england-academies-trust/","titre":"CKT and DGT -v- Twyford Church of England Academies Trust","pubDate":"Fri, 23 Oct 2026 14:07:27 +0200"},{"url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-fry-and-others/","titre":"R -v- FRY and others","pubDate":"Fri, 09 Oct 2026 14:10:20 +0200","description":"Case No: AC-2025-LON-004615 AC-2025-LON-002404 AC-2026-LON-002537 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Date: 09/10/2026 Before : Mr Justice Chamberlain Between : R on the application of (1) FRY (2) BNM1 (3) LR – and – Secretary of State for Defence – and – (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) BNM2 (3) BNM3 (4) BNM4 (5) BNM5 (6) BNM6 The post R -v- FRY and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3207077,"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales"},{"titre":"Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor -v- The Central Criminal Court and another","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-v-the-central-criminal-court-and-another/","pubDate":"Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:11:44 +0200","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","description":"Claim No. AC 2026-LON-002321 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 8 October 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Hilliard Between: The King on the application of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor -v- (1) The Central Criminal Court (2) The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police The post Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor -v- The Central Criminal Court and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3205983},{"pubDate":"Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:11:16 +0200","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/barclays-bank-uk-plc-and-others-v-financial-ombudsman-service-limited/","titre":"Barclays Bank UK plc and others -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","id":3139136,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2298 (Admin) Case No: AC-2024-LON-003318, AC-2024-LON-003499, AC-2024-LON-003464 and AC-2024-LON-003282 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 7 September 2026 Before: Mr Justice Dexter Dias Between: The King on the application of Barclays Bank UK plc National Westminster Bank plc Vanquis Bank Limited Santander UK plc -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited and Aaron Domer Arnold Gajraj Deborah Campbell Jojo Brown (Interested parties) and Financial Conduct Authoruty (Intervener) The post Barclays Bank UK plc and others -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"pubDate":"Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:05:10 +0200","titre":"Sadat and others -v- Home Secretary, and others","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sadat-and-others-v-home-secretary-and-others/","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","id":3090815,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2157 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-002601 AC-2026-LON-002666 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 12 August 2026 Before: The Hon Mrs Justice Steyn DBE Between: The King on the application of (1) SHAHIRA SADAT (2) ROKHSAR RAHIMI (3) ALAA KHALIFA (4) LINDA LEOGAH FORKWA -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department and between: The King on the application of (1) RAZAN AWAD FAGEER FARAH (2) RAWAN SIDDIG BABIKER ALI (3) RAWAN RAAD HASSAN ELRUFAI -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department The post Sadat and others -v- Home Secretary, and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"pubDate":"Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:09:40 +0200","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rahim-v-defence-secretary-and-another/","titre":"Rahim -v- Defence Secretary and another","id":3069463,"description":"Neutral Citation Number [2024] EWHC 3708 (Admin) AC-2023-LON-3184 and AC-2024-LON-454 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 4 October 2024 Published: 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Swift Between: The King on the application of Haziz Rahim -v- Secretary of State for Defence Secretary of State for the Home Department The post Rahim -v- Defence Secretary and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales"},{"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","id":3069456,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1986 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-001063 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice McKendrick Between: The King on the application of BB -v- The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis The post BB -v- Met Police Commissioner appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","pubDate":"Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:09:39 +0200","titre":"BB -v- Met Police Commissioner","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/bb-v-met-police-commissioner/"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2043 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-000818 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: The King on the application of Bayswater Support Group Keira Bell James Esses -v- Health Research Authority Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and King’s College London South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Interested parties) The post Bayswater Support Group and others -v- Health Research Authority and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3069458,"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/bayswater-support-group-and-others-v-health-research-authority-and-another/","titre":"Bayswater Support Group and others -v- Health Research Authority and another","pubDate":"Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:09:39 +0200"},{"url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sex-matters-v-national-police-chiefs-council-and-another/","titre":"Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council and another","pubDate":"Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:06:14 +0200","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1954 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-002926 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Linden Between: The King on the application of Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and Secretary of State for the Home Department (interested party) The post Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3067260,"source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales"},{"pubDate":"Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:06:13 +0200","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/home-secretary-v-special-immigration-appeals-commission/","titre":"Home Secretary -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission","id":3067259,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 992 Appeal Nos: CA-2025-002134 Case Nos: AC-2024-LON-000883 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Dame Victoria Sharp P and Mrs Justice Farbey [2025] EWHC 2019 (Admin) 31 July 2026 Before: Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls Lord Justice Bean, Vice President of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lord Justice Singh Between: The King on the application of Secretary of State for the Home Department -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission and FGF (First Interested Party) and H7 H15 (Second and Third Interested Parties/Appellants) The post Home Secretary -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:08:38 +0200","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/wild-justice-and-badger-trust-v-natural-england/","titre":"Wild Justice and Badger Trust -v- Natural England","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","id":3058513,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1932 (Admin) Case No: AC-2024-LON-002644 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court sitting in London 28 July 2026 Before: Fordham J Between: The King on the application of Wild Justice Badger Trust -v- Natural England and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Interested party) The post Wild Justice and Badger Trust -v- Natural England appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3047130,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1842 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-003760 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Divisional Court 22 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Popplewell Mr Justice Hilliard Between: The King on the application of Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court and The Environment Agency Philip Barker Clive Massey Mark Gregory (Interested parties) The post Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","source":"Judgement Courts Tribunals England Wales","pubDate":"Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:05:22 +0200","url":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/matthew-wright-v-medway-magistrates-court/","titre":"Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court"},{"id":2413306,"description":"Un Tribunal administratif vient de valider une formule de notation des offres financières au carré, permettant de creuser les écarts par rapport à une formule inversement proportionnelle classique. Il résulte de l’instruction que l’article 6.2.2 du règlement de consultation que la note de prix des prestations est définie par application de la formule suivante :… Lire la suite The post Notation des offres financières au carré… c'est possible ! appeared first on Code : Commande Publique","source":"Actualités du site Code Commande Publique","pubDate":"Fri, 03 Oct 2025 16:18:12 +0200","url":"https://www.code-commande-publique.com/notation-des-offres-financieres-au-carre-cest-possible/","titre":"Notation des offres financières au carré... c’est possible !"}]