[{"source":"Slaw","description":"Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. Environmental Law and Litigation 2. Canadian Combat Sports Law Blog 3. Eloise Gratton 4. Michael Geist 5. Family Health Law Blog Environmental Law and Litigation The Canadian consumer: Regional differences and buying behaviour A franchise system opens its first Canadian location in the Greater Toronto Area and . . . [more] The post Monday’s Mix appeared first on Slaw","id":3259858,"titre":"Monday’s Mix","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/11/02/mondays-mix-671/","pubDate":"Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:13:37 +0100"},{"url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/10/27/summarize-this/","titre":"Summarize This?","pubDate":"Tue, 27 Oct 2026 13:53:40 +0100","description":"Last week, the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) released its updated Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Canadian Courts. Credit is due to the CJC for its ongoing thoughtful engagement on this important topic. Similarly, several Quebec courts released their own guidelines on judicial AI use last month. This column looks at one feature that both sets of guidelines have in common: guidance for judges on using AI tools to summarize material filed with the court, including evidence and submissions. This is far from the only aspect of the CJC and Quebec guidelines worthy of discussion, but it is . . . [more] The post Summarize This? appeared first on Slaw","id":3244415,"source":"Slaw"},{"url":"https://www.callacbd.ca/CALL-Blog/12854401","titre":"CALL Member Article: Gender Inclusivity in Canadian Legal Writing and Style Guides","pubDate":"Mon, 26 Oct 2026 07:55:48 +0100","description":"CALL member Dominique Garingan , Library Manager in the Calgary office of Parlee McLaws LLP, recently wrote an article on \" The Singular They: Gender Inclusivity in Canadian Legal Writing and Style Guides \" . It originally appeared on the website Notes Between Us on June 22, 2022 . It is reprinted here with permission. Language is a product of culture, and it is known that the English language lacks a singular pronoun that signifies the non-specific   he   or   she . Although at times unintentional, this singularity versus plurality of pronouns, coupled with gendered indicators, has helped entrench the binary perceptions of gender found in writing which we are now seeking to change.  The Department of Justice of Canada recently provided a   series of guidelines   on the use of gender-neutral language in a legislative context. These guidelines include as a recommendation the use of the singular   they   and its other grammatical forms ( them ,   themselves , and   their ) to refer to indefinite pronouns and singular nouns 1 . In addition, dictionaries such as the Oxford English Dictionary ( definition 2 | blog ), the Canadian Oxford Dictionary ( definition 3 ), the Cambridge Dictionary ( definition ) and the Merriam-Webster Dictionary ( definition | blog ) have acknowledged both the acceptability – and, for some, the controversy – of the singular   they. While there seems to be a growing acceptance towards gender inclusive and non-binary pronouns, this post seeks to explore an increasingly acknowledged yet still seemingly paradoxical entity in legal writing:   the singular   they . This post briefly investigates the use and acceptance or lack thereof of   they   as a singular pronoun through a review of a limited sample of Canadian legal research, writing, and style guides accessible to the writer. Although current writing practices on gender inclusivity may have since changed since the publication of these titles, this post hopes to assist writers, researchers, librarians, and information professionals by providing a non-exhaustive point-in-time review of Canadian legal writing references and help facilitate a turning point in the journey towards greater inclusivity in legal writing. The Literature Reviewed (in Reverse Order of Publication) Edward Berry,   Writing Reasons: A Handbook for Judges , 5th ed (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2020).  In the sample of guides reviewed,   Writing Reasons   seemed to provide the most inclusive perspective in its instruction. It was somewhat refreshing to see a writing handbook for judges as being the most progressive in its recommendations, albeit also the most recently published. The guide contains a section entitled   Prejudicial Language   and provides a checklist for more inclusive strategies. (p 114-115) “Invite the parties to define their own identity” is first on the list. As an example, Berry notes that some people may prefer the gender neutral   Mx.   to   Mr.   or   Ms . “Be wary of personal pronouns” is also listed. Here, Berry states that those who don’t identify as male or female may prefer   they . Berry notes the acceptance of   they   as a singular pronoun. However, the","id":3241470,"source":"Canadian Association of Law Libraries / L'Association canadienne des bibliothèques de droit CALL/ACBD Blog"},{"id":3200948,"description":"Mediators are often asked by parties or their counsel to send them a copy of their “standard Agreement to Mediate” for review. But is there such a document? If by “standard” we mean some prescribed form followed by all mediators, the answer is no. Virtually every mediator has his or her own Agreement. Some are based on agreements provided in mediation training, while others are quite customized. This article has its origin in a recent mediation. One of the three lawyers attending had clearly not read the Agreement to Mediate, although it had been sent to him weeks earlier. When . . . [more] The post The “Standard” Agreement to Mediate appeared first on Slaw","source":"Slaw","pubDate":"Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:57:09 +0200","titre":"The “Standard” Agreement to Mediate","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/10/06/the-standard-agreement-to-mediate/"},{"description":"Keep FCRA in the foreground when the subject is background screening chundycz April 9, 2014 | 12:13AM Keep FCRA in the foreground when the subject is background screening By Lesley Fair When the talk turns to Big Data, part of the conversation is about all the public information available about people's lives – and how companies market it to prospective employers, landlords, etc.  Two cases just announced by the FTC  serve as a cautionary reminder to members of the industry that what they do may be subject to the long-standing consumer protections of the  Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) .  InfoTrack, an Illinois company, and San Diego-based Instant Checkmate will be paying civil penalties to settle FTC lawsuits that they violated the FCRA.  Is it time for an FCRA refresher at your business? Instant Checkmate marketed its reports as a way for prospective employers and landlords to investigate applicants.  For example, the company advertised that one of the “GOOD REASONS to get instant criminal checks on anyone right now” was to “check out tenants before they rent.”  It also used a Google Ad Words campaign to make sure its site appeared when people searched for background checks on nannies, babysitters, maids, and housekeepers.  What kind of information would buyers get?  Current and previous addresses, birth certificates, arrest histories, and marriage and divorce records, to name just a few examples. InfoTrack offered similar services to employers nationwide, including background screening reports with people’s driving records, education and employment information, criminal histories, and even records from sex offender registries. How does the FCRA come in?  The law defines a “consumer report” as a “communication of any information” by a consumer reporting agency (CRA) that bears on a person’s “credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living” which is used (or expected to be used) as a factor in establishing their eligibility for credit, insurance, employment, or other reasons outlined in the law. According to the FTC, what Instant Checkmate and InfoTrack were doing triggered the FCRA.  For example, companies covered by the law must follow procedures to assure their reports are as accurate as possible, must take steps to see that those using their reports have permissible purposes for accessing them, and must provide required User Notices explaining key protections for consumers.  The law imposes special requirements when CRAs provide reports containing public record information that could have an adverse effect on a person’s ability to get a job.  In that case, the CRA must either: 1) notify the consumer that it’s reporting the information in the public record; or 2) maintain “strict procedures” – that’s the language in the law – designed to ensure the reported public information is complete and up to date. You’ll want to read the complaints for specifics of where the FTC says the companies fell short, but one example cited in the lawsuit against InfoTrack offers an object lesson on why FCRA protections are so important to consumers – and how the consequences can be devastating when companies don’t live up to the law.  According to the FTC, the reports InfoTrack provided to prospective employers included information about whether a job applicant was on the National Sex Offender Registry.  The employer would provide the first and last name and the date of birth to help InfoTrack with its search.  The problem was that before the fall of 2011, no date of birth was available for many names on the Registry.  If InfoTrack’s search found more than one person with the same first and last name, it reported a “possible match” to employers and gave them reports that included several different people with the","id":3198181,"source":"FTC USA Business Blog Posts","titre":"Keep FCRA in the foreground when the subject is background screening","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2014/04/keep-fcra-foreground-when-subject-background-screening","pubDate":"Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:07:46 +0200"},{"source":"FTC USA Business Blog Posts","description":"Company to pay $22 million for offering \"free\" credit scores that turned out to be not so free wfg-adm109 November 19, 2014 | 11:12AM Company to pay $22 million for offering \"free\" credit scores that turned out to be not so free By Lesley Fair We’ve brought law enforcement actions – dozens of ‘em. We’ve held workshops, issued reports, and sent warning letters. If it takes sky writing, tap dancing, and a float in a Thanksgiving Day parade, we’ll do that, too. But here’s what’s not going to happen. The FTC is not giving up until businesses get the message that: 1) Free means free; and 2) Key terms and conditions have to be clearly and conspicuously disclosed. A $22 million settlement announced by the FTC and the AGs of Illinois and Ohio with a national credit monitoring service advertising so-called “free” credit scores emphasizes that point. Another note for practitioners: It's the FTC's third case alleging violations of ROSCA . One Technologies and related outfits marketed their credit monitoring programs, MyCreditHealth and ScoreSense, through at least 50 sites, including FreeScore360.com, FreeScoreOnline.com and ScoreSense.com. Their strategy was simple. Buy advertising on search engines so their ads show up near the top when people look for phrases like “free credit report\" and then follow up with a persuasive pitch: “View your latest Credit Scores from All 3 Bureaus in 60 seconds for $0!” According to the lawsuit , the defendants failed to clearly tell consumers that if they availed themselves of those “free” services and didn’t cancel within seven days, the defendants would ding their credit cards for $29.95 a month over and over and over again. The complaint includes screen shots of the defendants’ sites, but before looking at them, take out your reading glasses because they’ll come in handy in trying to locate where the defendants chose to tell people about that $29.95 monthly fee. One line of fine print added in late 2012 said “Free 7-Day trial when you order your 3 Free Credit Scores. Membership is then just $29.95 per month until you call to cancel.” The first problem: The type was tiny – a fraction of the size of the defendants’ multiple use of the word “free.” The second problem: Why should consumers even have to be on the look-out for the cost, given that the defendants so prominently advertised it as “free”? A second purported disclosure appeared as an obscure hyperlink on the page where people typed in their Social Security number and birthdate.  Sandwiched between the logos of various security firms and a large color button that said CONTINUE was this less-than-crystal-clear statement: By clicking on the ‘Continue’ button, you agree to the Offer Details, to the Terms and Conditions, acknowledge receipt of our Privacy Policy and agree to its terms . . . The “Offer Details” link triggered a small pop-up that said, among other things, “At the end of the 7-day trial period, your credit/debit card will be charged $29.95 on a monthly basis until you call to cancel.” Another place the defendants put the information was on a side panel of the Payment Form in white letters on a grey background – a color combination one of the defendants’ own employees described as “known to cause seizures in lab rats.” According to the complaint, once people spotted the unauthorized charges on their accounts, the defendants didn’t make it easy to stop the billing.  And even when people asked for their money back because they hadn’t approved of the charges, the defendants denied refunds to many of them. The lawsuit alleges violations of the FTC Act, as well as the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, and related state rules. In addition, the complaint is the third FTC action to charge violations of ROSCA, the Restore Online Shoppers’","id":3194913,"titre":"Company to pay $22 million for offering \"free\" credit scores that turned out to be not so free","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2014/11/company-pay-22-million-offering-free-credit-scores-turned-out-be-not-so-free","pubDate":"Sat, 03 Oct 2026 08:09:37 +0200"},{"pubDate":"Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:10:47 +0200","titre":"Lights out on unsubstantiated pain relief claims and deceptive native advertising","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2020/06/lights-out-unsubstantiated-pain-relief-claims-deceptive-native-advertising","id":3191275,"description":"Lights out on unsubstantiated pain relief claims and deceptive native advertising lfair June 25, 2020 | 3:00PM Lights out on unsubstantiated pain relief claims and deceptive native advertising By Lesley Fair For consumers struggling with severe or chronic pain, ads for a product called Willow Curve appeared to offer light at the end of the tunnel. But the FTC alleges the marketers made false and unsubstantiated claims for the product , a device that applied low-level light and mild heat to the site of pain – and set people back between $599 and $799 in the process. The proposed settlement also sheds light on the FTC’s ongoing concern with deceptive native advertising. The complaint names two Michigan companies, Physician’s Technology, LLC, and Willow Labs, LLC, and two individuals affiliated with both businesses, Dr. Ronald Shapiro and David Sutton. In ads on national TV, satellite radio, online, and in social media, the defendants claimed that for people suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, nerve damage, shingles, fibromyalgia, lupus, torn tendons, and other serious conditions, the light-emitting Willow Curve would provide “real, lasting, proven pain relief, without the costs, risks or inconvenience associated with elective surgery, prescription drugs or office visits.” The defendants also sold Willow Curve through a network of distributors and resellers, supplying them with promotional materials touting the product’s purported health benefits. What’s more, the defendants claimed to have clinical studies to support what they said about Willow Curve and that the FDA had reviewed and approved the device for its advertised pain relief and other health benefits. The FTC challenges those claims as false. The complaint also alleges the defendants advertised a “risk-free” and “money-back” guarantee for consumers if they were “not completely satisfied” within a specified time period. But the FTC says in many instances, the defendants required consumers to jump through hoops to get the hefty purchase price back – for example, by first undertaking a regimen of 92 “treatments” over a 180-day period. According to the complaint, those requirements were hidden behind hyperlinks or buried in paperwork in the Willow Curve box. Despite the defendants’ claim that they issued refunds within seven to ten business days, the FTC says some people never got their money back. Others got a refund a year or more later or only after reporting the defendants to a State Attorney General or the Better Business Bureau. Another notable count relates to the defendants’ use of native advertising. For example, what appeared to be an online magazine article, “Understanding the Gender Gap in Sports Injuries and Treatment,” was actually advertising for Willow Curve. According to the FTC, the defendants hired a marketing company to write this article and others, which looked a lot like the non-advertising content of the magazines and newspapers in which the ads ran. The complaint alleges the articles weren’t identifiable as ads, including when consumers posted or shared them on social media or in email. The settlement includes a judgment of $22 million, which – based on the defendants’ financial condition – will be partially suspended when defendants Shapiro and Sutton each pay $200,000. Among other things, the proposed order requires the defendants to have randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled testing to support a broad range of pain relief claims. The order also prohibits them from representing expressly or by implication that advertising is a statement or opinion from an independent publisher or source. The case illuminates some issues of interest to advertisers. Support pain relief claims with sound science.   There’s a predictable cycle. As more consumers experience chronic and serious pain, more marketers position their products as purported remedies. What comes next?","source":"FTC USA Business Blog Posts"},{"id":3187485,"description":"FTC takes on unproven health claims and “own-dorsements” lfair March 19, 2020 | 4:38PM FTC takes on unproven health claims and “own-dorsements” By Lesley Fair It’s a disturbing trend. Companies are targeting older consumers, claiming to have easy answers for serious diseases for which there may not be a proven cure. That’s one allegation in the FTC’s action against Nevada-based telemarketer Health Center, Inc.   Another count challenges what we call “own-dorsements.” According to Health Center’s telemarketing scripts, websites, social media, and testimonials from supposedly satisfied customers, the company’s Rejuvi-Cell oral spray and Rejuvi-Sea and Rejuvi-Stem pills could treat a broad range of medical conditions: everything from cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease to hepatitis, heart attacks, and high cholesterol. In promoting the products, which sold in packages priced between $350 and $800, the company checked the buzzword boxes with science-y sounding terms like homeopathic , adult stem cell enhancement , and marine phytoplankton . The company claimed that diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and dementia “could be greatly reduced if not eliminated” through the use of its products. According to the complaint , Health Center’s telemarketers – who were instructed to follow the scripts word-for-word – told consumers the main ingredient of Rejuvi-Sea “alkalizes your body . . . so you can’t grow cancer cells.” Then there were heartfelt testimonials from purported customers who described themselves as “walking on air” and “amazed and redeemed,” thanks to the products. But the FTC says the company hasn’t conducted any studies demonstrating the products cure or treat any diseases or health conditions and there are no human clinical studies in the scientific literature to that effect. What’s more, the lawsuit alleges that some of those glowing endorsements that appeared to come from satisfied customers across the country were actually “own-dorsements” – testimonials from Health Center’s own employees. To settle the case , the defendants have agreed to injunctive provisions, including a requirement that a broad range of health claims must have the support of randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled human clinical testing. Almost all of the $8.6 million judgment will be suspended, based on their financial condition. Aside from the obvious points that the FTC continues to take a close look at cures targeting older consumers and that companies shouldn’t palm off endorsements from employees as independent opinions, the case illustrates two other important principles. First, the defendants’ unlawful practices were the subject of an earlier enforcement action by the Iowa Attorney General. Companies shouldn’t have to be told once of the need to substantiate their health claims – and they certainly shouldn’t have to be told twice. Second, the complaint includes a count for violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule , which prohibits misrepresentations about “any material aspect of the performance, efficacy, nature, or central characteristics of goods or services that are the subject of a sales offer.” That’s yet another reason to keep your telemarketing efforts above board .","source":"FTC USA Business Blog Posts","pubDate":"Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:10:25 +0200","url":"https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2020/03/ftc-takes-unproven-health-claims-own-dorsements","titre":"FTC takes on unproven health claims and “own-dorsements”"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:02:21 +0200","titre":"Monday’s Mix","url":"https://www.slaw.ca/2026/07/13/mondays-mix-658/","source":"Slaw","id":3029027,"description":"Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award­-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. Canadian Class Actions Monitor 2. Know How 3. Canadian Appeals Monitor 4. David Whelan 5. Welcome to the Food Court Canadian Class Actions Monitor Submission to Finance Canada as part of its Pre-budget Consultations in Advance of the upcoming 2025 Fall Federal Budget There has been a . . . [more] The post Monday’s Mix appeared first on Slaw"},{"url":"https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-138/h-b-3-2024-leg-reg-sess-fla-2024/","titre":"H.B. 3, 2024 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Fla. 2024)","pubDate":"Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:42:48 +0100","description":"With minors spending more time than ever on social media, many parents are concerned about its effects on their children. In response, legislatures across... The post H.B. 3, 2024 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Fla. 2024) appeared first on Harvard Law Review","id":1905864,"source":"Harvard Law Review"},{"description":"Key Takeaways: Empowering Businesses for a Sustainable Future In a move that underscores its commitment to sustainability and climate action, Ecochain has joined the PACT network, a milestone that promises to reshape how businesses navigate their carbon footprints and environmental impact across their value chains. A Step Towards Carbon Transparency Ecochain’s inclusion in the PACT catalog as a PACT conformant solution signifies a pivotal moment in the global effort to achieve carbon transparency. By adhering to the technical specifications set forth by the Partnership for Carbon Transparency (PACT), Ecochain aims to empower businesses with the tools to make informed, carbon-conscious The post Ecochain Joins PACT Network: Accelerating Carbon Transparency in Business appeared first on Business Today","id":1282816,"source":"Business Today","url":"https://businesstoday.news/ecochain-joins-pact-network-accelerating-carbon-transparency-in-business/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ecochain-joins-pact-network-accelerating-carbon-transparency-in-business","titre":"Ecochain Joins PACT Network: Accelerating Carbon Transparency in Business","pubDate":"Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:39:46 +0200"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:40:56 +0200","titre":"Funeral Directors’ Game-Changer: Exclusive Partnership Unleashes Seamless Payment Solutions!","url":"https://businesstoday.news/funeral-directors-game-changer-exclusive-partnership-unleashes-seamless-payment-solutions/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=funeral-directors-game-changer-exclusive-partnership-unleashes-seamless-payment-solutions","source":"Business Today","id":1270381,"description":"Key Takeaways: A Transformation in Payment Services: Cashflows and NAFD Forge a Gold Partnership In a significant development for the funeral industry, Cashflows has been named the Gold Partner for payment services by the National Association of Funeral Directors (NAFD), heralding a new era of streamlined and efficient payment solutions for funeral professionals. This exclusive partnership promises seamless transitions, high authorization rates, and personalized support, marking a game-changer for funeral directors and their clients. Empowering Funeral Directors: Seamless Payment Solutions Cashflows’ Gold Partner status with NAFD underscores its commitment to providing cutting-edge payment solutions tailored to the unique needs of The post Funeral Directors’ Game-Changer: Exclusive Partnership Unleashes Seamless Payment Solutions! appeared first on Business Today"},{"description":"Key Takeaways: Unveiling the Pub Popularity Contest In a nostalgic nod to beloved television series, a recent survey conducted by small business insurance provider Simply Business has unveiled the UK’s favorite fictional pub. The winner? None other than the iconic Rovers Return Inn from the long-running soap opera Coronation Street. This revelation comes as part of a larger exploration into the enduring appeal of on-screen pubs and their real-world counterparts. The Reigning Champion: Rovers Return Inn With a legacy spanning decades, the Rovers Return Inn has secured a special place in the hearts of viewers across the nation. Its cozy The post The Pub Phenomenon: Revealing Britain’s Beloved On-Screen Haunts appeared first on Business Today","id":1270378,"source":"Business Today","titre":"The Pub Phenomenon: Revealing Britain’s Beloved On-Screen Haunts","url":"https://businesstoday.news/the-pub-phenomenon-revealing-britains-beloved-on-screen-haunts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-pub-phenomenon-revealing-britains-beloved-on-screen-haunts","pubDate":"Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:40:55 +0200"},{"url":"https://businesstoday.news/the-tech-powerhouses-secret-weapon-revealed-meet-the-newest-addition-to-their-board/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-tech-powerhouses-secret-weapon-revealed-meet-the-newest-addition-to-their-board","titre":"The Tech Powerhouse’s Secret Weapon Revealed! Meet the Newest Addition to Their Board","pubDate":"Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:36:24 +0200","description":"Key Takeaways: Pipedrive’s Strategic Leap: Welcoming Tom Burnet to the Board of Directors A Game-Changing Addition Pipedrive, the leading sales CRM platform for small businesses, has made a strategic move by appointing Tom Burnet, a seasoned tech executive, to its Board of Directors. This decision marks a significant step forward in Pipedrive’s journey towards global expansion and continued innovation in the competitive tech landscape. Meet Tom Burnet: A Tech Visionary with a Proven Track Record Tom Burnet brings a wealth of experience and expertise to Pipedrive’s boardroom. With a distinguished career that includes leadership roles in top-tier public and private The post The Tech Powerhouse’s Secret Weapon Revealed! Meet the Newest Addition to Their Board appeared first on Business Today","id":1253871,"source":"Business Today"},{"url":"https://businesstoday.news/banking-on-satisfaction-the-paradox-of-high-pay-and-low-happiness-in-finance/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=banking-on-satisfaction-the-paradox-of-high-pay-and-low-happiness-in-finance","titre":"Banking on Satisfaction: The Paradox of High Pay and Low Happiness in Finance","pubDate":"Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:37:20 +0200","description":"Key Takeaways: Unveiling Compensation Dynamics Dissecting the Pay Satisfaction Paradox The latest findings from eFinancialCareers spotlight a complex narrative where hefty paychecks do not always equate to higher employee contentment in the finance industry. With an extensive global survey underpinning the report, the data paints a detailed picture of the compensation landscape across various banking activities. A Closer Look at Investment Banking Investment banking, notorious for its high-stress environment and competitive salaries, shows a mere fraction of employees are genuinely content with their pay, despite the sector experiencing a general uptick in bonuses. The Global Finance Salary Spectrum Banking on The post Banking on Satisfaction: The Paradox of High Pay and Low Happiness in Finance appeared first on Business Today","id":1237683,"source":"Business Today"},{"titre":"Female Tech Titans Rising: Meet the Visionaries Leading the Charge in Google’s 2024 Accelerator","url":"https://businesstoday.news/female-tech-titans-rising-meet-the-visionaries-leading-the-charge-in-googles-2024-accelerator/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=female-tech-titans-rising-meet-the-visionaries-leading-the-charge-in-googles-2024-accelerator","pubDate":"Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:37:19 +0200","description":"Key Takeaways: Breaking New Ground in Tech Pioneering Leadership Anna Franziska Michel of yoona.ai and Dr. Vivien Dollinger of ObjectBox represent the epitome of female leadership in the tech industry, guiding their companies to international recognition and success. Their inclusion in Google’s accelerator program marks a significant milestone in their journey of innovation and market expansion. The Google Accelerator Impact Google’s accelerator program, now embracing its 5th edition, has extended its reach into the European and Israeli tech landscapes, highlighting the growing influence and importance of diverse tech entrepreneurship on the global stage. Innovation at the Forefront yoona.ai: Revolutionizing Design The post Female Tech Titans Rising: Meet the Visionaries Leading the Charge in Google’s 2024 Accelerator appeared first on Business Today","id":1237682,"source":"Business Today"},{"pubDate":"Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:37:18 +0200","url":"https://businesstoday.news/ai-power-move-how-this-consultancy-is-redefining-industry-titans-with-top-tier-talent/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ai-power-move-how-this-consultancy-is-redefining-industry-titans-with-top-tier-talent","titre":"AI Power Move: How This Consultancy Is Redefining Industry Titans with Top-Tier Talent","source":"Business Today","id":1237677,"description":"Key Takeaways: Strategic Expansion in Leadership Mesh-AI’s Bold Move In a strategic play to accelerate its growth, Mesh-AI, a leading consultancy in data and AI enterprise transformation, has announced the induction of two senior figures from Amazon Web Services (AWS) into its leadership team. This move signifies Mesh-AI’s commitment to enhancing its service offerings and expanding its market reach. Leadership with a Vision Jacob Parsons and James Houlton, the new Chief Revenue Officer and Director of Energy & Utilities respectively, bring a wealth of experience from AWS, aiming to replicate their success at Mesh-AI. Their roles are critical in steering The post AI Power Move: How This Consultancy Is Redefining Industry Titans with Top-Tier Talent appeared first on Business Today"},{"titre":"EHPM launched its nutrivigilance guidelines","url":"https://ehpm.org/news/24feb-nutrivigilance-guidelines/","pubDate":"Tue, 05 Mar 2024 15:36:04 +0100","description":"On Thursday 29 February 2024, the EHPM hosted the launch event of its guidelines for food supplement companies on the management of adverse event reports. EHPM Chairperson Antonino Santoro presented the EHPM guidelines and representatives from two national authorities, Belgium and Italy, presented their respective post-market vigilance systems. Their presentations were followed by the Read more > The post EHPM launched its nutrivigilance guidelines appeared first on Ehpm","id":1165317,"source":"EHPM"}]