[{"id":2866122,"title":"R -v- Nancy Pexton","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-nancy-pexton/","description":"At the Central Criminal Court 1 May 2026 Sentencing remarks of HHJ Dhir KC Between: Rex -v- Nancy Pexton The post R -v- Nancy Pexton appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1014 (Ch) Case No: CR-2025-008149 In the High Court of Justice Chancery Division Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Insolvency and Companies List (ChD) 5 May 2026 Before: Mr Justice Michael Green In the matter of Waldorf Production UK Plc and and in the matter of the Companies Act 2006 The post In the matter of Waldorf Production UK Plc appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/in-the-matter-of-waldorf-production-uk-plc/","id":2866123,"title":"In the matter of Waldorf Production UK Plc"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf84/2026caf84.html","id":2865531,"title":"Chad c. Canada, 2026 CAF 84 (CanLII)","description":"impôt — canadienne — réaliser un profit — arrêt —"},{"description":"Louage Document mis-à-jour le","title":"Highway Properties Ltd. c. Kelly, Douglas and Co. Ltd. - [1971] RCS 562 - 1971-02-01","id":2862630,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/4925/index.do"},{"title":"R. c. Donawa - 2025 CSC 10 - 2025-03-26","id":2862148,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/20932/index.do","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21484/index.do","id":2861605,"title":"Alford c. Canada (Procureur général) - 2026 CSC 14 - 2026-05-01"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21476/index.do","id":2861604,"title":"Québec (Procureur général) c. Lalande - 2026 CSC 13 - 2026-05-01","description":"Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1033 (Fam) Case No: FD24P00632 In the High Court of Justice Family Division 1 May 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Hayden Between: Claire Mireille N’Djosse -v- Ifedayo Adedapo Kolawole Adeyeye The post Claire Mireille N’Djosse -v- Ifedayo Adedapo Kolawole Adeyeye appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/claire-mireille-ndjosse-v-ifedayo-adedapo-kolawole-adeyeye/","title":"Claire Mireille N’Djosse -v- Ifedayo Adedapo Kolawole Adeyeye","id":2861602},{"description":"In the Central Criminal Court 1 May 2026 Sentencing remarks of HHJ Lucraft KC Between: Rex -v- Paul Robert Jones The post R -v- Paul Robert Jones appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Paul Robert Jones","id":2861603,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-paul-robert-jones/"},{"description":"Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Democratic rights — Right to vote — electoral divisions — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 1, 3 — Electoral Boundaries Commission Act, R.S.Q. 1990, c. E-2.1, s. 18.1. Electoral Boundaries Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 107, s.","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026canlii36321/2026canlii36321.html","title":"Quebec (Attorney General) v. Lalande, 2026 SCC 13 (CanLII)","id":2861507},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc14/2026scc14.html","id":2861508,"title":"Alford v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 14 (CanLII)","description":"Constitutional law — Parliamentary privilege — Constitution Act, 1867, s. 42(1)(b) — National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act, S.C. 2017, c. 15, ss. 11,"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 999 (Pat) Case No: HP-2024-000044 In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patents Court 1 May 2026 Before: Mr Justice Meade Between: (1) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Korea) (2) Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited -v- (1) ZTE Corporation (a company incorporated under the laws of the People’s Republic of China) (2) ZTE (UK) Limited (3) Nubia Technology Co., Ltd (a company incorporated under the laws of the People’s Republic of China) (4) Livewire Telecom Limited (5) Efones.com Limited The post Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and another -v- ZTE Corporation and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-and-another-v-zte-corporation-and-others/","title":"Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and another -v- ZTE Corporation and others","id":2861082},{"title":"Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Pasqua First Nation, 2026 FCA 83 (CanLII)","id":2860689,"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca83/2026fca83.html","description":"Aboriginal peoples — Jurisdiction of the"},{"description":"Case No: CA-2026-000402 CA-2026-000405 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) On Appeal from the High Court of Justice Family Division Mr Justice Hayden 30 April 2026 Before: Lord Justice Moylan Lord Justice Newey and Lord Justice Dove Re – X (A Child) The post X (A Child) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/x-a-child/","title":"X (A Child)","id":2860234},{"description":"In the Crown Court at Maidstone (sitting at the Central Criminal Court) 30 April 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb Between: Rex -v- S, T and O The post R -v- S, T and O appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2860235,"title":"R -v- S, T and O","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-s-t-and-o/"},{"description":"Case No: CA-2025-00366 In The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) On Appeal from the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Commercial Court (KBD) Mr Justice Bright Date: 30/04/2026 Before : Lord Justice Moylan and Lord Justice Miles Between : Ziyavudin Magomedov & Ors – and – TPG Group Holdings (SBS), LP & Ors The post Ziyavudin Magomedov -v- TPG Group Holdings appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2857742,"title":"Ziyavudin Magomedov -v- TPG Group Holdings","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/ziyavudin-magomedov-v-tpg-group-holdings/"},{"title":"Abbott -v- Zimmer Inc. and others (transmission direction order)","id":2855147,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/abbott-v-zimmer-inc-and-others-transmission-direction-order/","description":"Claim number: KB-2025-004539 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 28 April 2026 Before: Senior Master Cook Between: (1) Ian Abbott (Claimant) -v- (1) Zimmer Inc. (2) Zimmer Biomet UK Limited (3) Spire Healthcare Limited (Defendants) Order UPON the Claimants having commenced claims for damages against the Defendants arising from the design and supply of Knee prostheses (known as the Next Generation Litigation) AND UPON a case management hearing being listed at 10.30 am on 11 May 2026 AND UPON the Court considering that it is likely that persons not taking part in the proceedings may wish to attend the hearing remotely IT IS ORDERED that Any request by a person not taking part in the proceedings (“an applicant”) for a direction under s.85A(3)(b) Courts Act 2003 for permission to watch or listen to the hearing remotely (“a transmission direction request”) must be made (in accordance with Paragraph 2 below) by 4pm on 7 May 2026 Any transmission direction request must be sent to ilaria.capanni@justice.gov.uk and must include the following: a. the full name of the applicant; b. the email address of the applicant; be sent c. information as to whether the applicant would be located within the jurisdiction of England and Wales at all times when attending the Pre-Trial Hearing remotely (if a transmission direction were to be made); and, if not, details of the applicant’s location; d. any information the applicant wishes to provide in support of the request, including in particular any reason(s) why it is contended that making such a direction would be in the interests of justice; and e. a statement by the applicant in the following terms: “ I agree and undertake to the Court that, if permitted to attend each day of the Pre-Trial Hearing remotely, I will not make a recording, capture images, and/or broadcast any part of the proceedings. I understand that to do so may be an offence and/or contempt of court, punishable by imprisonment and/or a fine. I will abide by any directions given to me by the Court during the GLO hearing. I agree and undertake to the Court that I will not provide the link that I am given to access the GLO hearing to any other person. ” A transmission direction request that is not made by the deadline imposed by Paragraph 1 of this Order and/or does not comply with Paragraph 2 of this Order may be refused. Any transmission direction request made otherwise than in accordance with the directions in Paragraphs 1 and 2 must be made by way of Application Notice. Reasons By these proceedings a large number of Claimants bring claims for damages against the Defendants arising out of the design and supply of Knee prostheses. The Court anticipates that there may be interest from media representatives and members of the public in attending the hearing remotely. To manage the process, a straightforward procedure whereby anyone who wishes to attend the hearing remotely can make a transmission direction request by email is appropriate. The Court will not normally grant a transmission direction request in respect of an applicant who will not be in England & Wales during the hearing. Anyone making a transmission direction request who will not be in England & Wales should provide information (pursuant to paragraph 2(d) above) as to why it would nevertheless be in the interests of justice to make a transmission direction order in his/her case. Late requests, because they cause disruption to the Court’s work and utilise a disproportionate amount of the Court’s limited resources are likely to be refused, unless there are compelling reasons why the applicant was unable to comply with the Court’s directions. The post Abbott -v- Zimmer Inc. and others (transmission direction order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-royal-borough-of-kensington-and-chelsea-and-another-v-beko-poland-manufacturing-and-others-privacy-order/","title":"The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and another -v- Beko Poland Manufacturing and others (privacy order)","id":2855148,"description":"Claim numbers: QB-2020-004516 KB-2024-003250 KB-2024-003251 KB-2024-003253 KB-2024-003255 KB-2025-000483 In the Grenfell Tower Litigation In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 28 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Jefford DBE and Senior Master Cook Between: (1) The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2) The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation Limited (Claimants) -v- Beko Poland Manufacturing sp. zo.o and 14 others (Defendants) and Exova UK Limited and others (Part 20 Defendants) Privacy order UPON : (1) The Claimants identifying that there are individuals: (a) Who (on the Claimants’ case) received benefits in kind and/or monetary benefits and/or other direct or indirect assistance as a consequence of the Fire whose personal information appears within the Schedule of Loss and/or supporting Appendices and/or documents provided by the Claimants in support of their claims within the Grenfell Tower Litigation (the “ Proceedings ”); and (b) In respect of whom non-disclosure of certain information is necessary to secure the proper administration of justice and in order to protect the Article 8 rights to respect for private and family life. (2) There being no sufficient countervailing public interest in disclosure under the Article 10 right to freedom of expression. (3) The Defendants and Part 20 Defendants indicating their consent to the making of the order. AND PURSUANT  to section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and CPR rules 5.4C, 5.4D and 39.2(4). WHEREAS  for the purposes of this order: (1) “ Confidential Cipher ” means a confidential list agreed between the Parties or approved by the Court from time to time, in which the names of Protected Individuals are ascribed non-identifying codes or numbers. (2) “ Protected Individual ” means an individual whose name appears on the Protected Individuals List. (3) The “ Protected Individuals List ” shall be a maintained list of individuals that the Claimants consider should each have protection as a Protected Individual under this Order as a person who received benefits in kind and/or monetary benefits and/or other direct or indirect assistance as a consequence of the Fire. (4) “ Publication ” includes any speech, writing, broadcast, or other communication in whatever form (including internet and social media), which is addressed to the public at large or any section of the public after the date of this Order. For the avoidance of doubt, the following do not constitute the public at large or any section of the public for the purposes of this Order: (a) The Court and the Court’s staff; (b) A party to any of the actions listed in the heading to this Order (including any claim brought pursuant to CPR Part 20) (each a “ Party ”, and together the “ Parties ”); (c) The insurer, reinsurer or insurance broker (“ Insurer ”) of such a Party, and/or the Insurer’s legal representatives, provided that the Publication of Protected Information to and/or within any such Insurer is reasonably necessary for the purposes of the Proceedings and/or for compliance with any regulatory or legal obligation to which any such Insurer (or the Party which has the benefit of cover from such Insurer) is subject; (d) A Party’s “ Advisers ” comprising legal representatives (including in-house counsel, solicitors and barristers) and professional advisers (including expert witnesses and advisers, accountants, and auditors) of such a Party and any person instructed or supervised by a Party or Adviser to support their work in these Proceedings; (e) A Party’s “ Affiliate ”, meaning, in relation to a Party, any entity controlled, directly or indirectly by that Party, any entity that controls, directly or indirectly, that Party, or any entity directly or indirectly under common control with that Party. For this purpose, “control” of any entity includes, but is not limited to, control"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 994 (Fam) Case No: FD25P00069 In the High Court of Justice Family Division 29 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Garrido Re: CX (A child) (Reporting restrictions order: National security) Between: Louise Tickle (Applicant) and (1) AZ (2) BY (3) CX by her children’s guardian (Respondents) The Secretary of State for Defence (Intervener) The post Re: CX (A child) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/re-cx-a-child/","title":"Re: CX (A child)","id":2855149},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-university-of-sussex-v-the-office-for-students/","title":"The University of Sussex -v- The Office for Students","id":2855150,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 984 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-001462 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 29 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Lieven Between: The King on the application of The University of Sussex -v- The Office for Students and The Free Speech Union Ltd (Intervener) The post The University of Sussex -v- The Office for Students appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2854157,"title":"Pappajohn c. La Reine - [1980] 2 RCS 120 - 1980-05-20","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2552/index.do"},{"id":2854154,"title":"Noel Redding and another -v- Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/noel-redding-and-another-v-sony-music-entertainment-uk-limited/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 983 (Ch) Claim No: IL-2022-000013 In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) 28 April 2026 Before: Mr Justice Edwin Johnson Between: Noel Redding Mitch Mitchell Estate Ltd -v- Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited The post Noel Redding and another -v- Sony Music Entertainment UK Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/jakir-ahmed-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department/","id":2854155,"title":"Jakir Ahmed -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 509 Case No: CA-2025-000911 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Upper Tribunal Judge Lodato UI-2024-005333 28 April 2026 Before: Lord Justice Baker Lord Justice Stuart-Smith Lord Justice Lewis Between: Jakir Ahmed -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department The post Jakir Ahmed -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"title":"Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Housing Secretary and others","id":2854156,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/royal-mint-court-residents-association-v-housing-secretary-and-others-2/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 958 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-000874/875 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Divisional Court 28 April 2026 Before: Lord Justice Dingemans, Senor President of Tribunals The Honourable Mrs Justice Lieven Between: The King on the application of Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government London Borough of Tower Hamlets Secretary of State for the Home Department Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs The post Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Housing Secretary and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"grief — preuve — syndicaux — commis une erreur déraisonnable —","title":"St-Laurent c. Syndicat québécois des employé-e-s de Telus (Syndicat canadien de la fonction publique, section locale 5044), 2026 CAF 81 (CanLII)","id":2852243,"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf81/2026caf81.html"},{"description":"At Manchester Crown Court 24 April 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Lavender Between: Rex -v- Abbas Hussain The post R -v- Abbas Hussain appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Abbas Hussain","id":2852095,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-abbas-hussain/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-david-skinner/","id":2850576,"title":"R -v- David Skinner","description":"Case reference: 55CH0180823 In the Bournemouth Crown Court on appeal from the Poole Magistrates Court 23 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Saini Sitting with Mr N. Butler JP and Mr J Griffin JP Between: The King -v- David Skinner The post R -v- David Skinner appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21354/index.do","id":2848166,"title":"Emond c. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co. - 2026 CSC 3 - 2026-01-30","description":"Assurance Nouveau document publié le"},{"id":2847985,"title":"Fridman v. Canada (Foreign Affairs), 2026 FCA 80 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca80/2026fca80.html","description":"Administrative law — Judicial review — Certiorari Foreign trade — Anti-Slapp, Courts — Judicial review of Minister’s"},{"description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21436/index.do","title":"R. c. G.G. - 2026 CSC 12 - 2026-04-24","id":2847574},{"description":"Droit criminel Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21347/index.do","id":2847573,"title":"R. c. Hussein - 2026 CSC 2 - 2026-01-23"},{"description":"In the Crown Court at Birmingham 24 April 2026 Sentencing remarks of The Hon. Mr Justice Pepperall Between: The King -v- John Ashby The post R -v- John Ashby appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-john-ashby/","title":"R -v- John Ashby","id":2847572},{"description":"Criminal law — Sexual assault — Elements of the offence — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s.","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026canlii24170/2026canlii24170.html","id":2847436,"title":"R. v. G.G., 2026 SCC 12 (CanLII)"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2846437,"title":"Compagnie des chemins de fer nationaux du Canada c. Courtois - [1988] 1 RCS 868 - 1988-05-26","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/327/index.do"},{"description":"Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21346/index.do","title":"R. c. B.B. - 2026 CSC 1 - 2026-01-22","id":2846436},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number [2026] EWHC 956 (Admin) Case Nos. AC-2024-LON-003645, AC-2024-LON-003491, AC-2024-LON-003648, AC-2024-LON-003614, and AC-2025-LON-000817 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 24 April 2026 Before: Mr Justice Swift Between: Edmond Haxhia Thomas Mithan Harry Simpson Harriet Bridgeman Steven Hunt -v- Republic of Albania and Case Nos. AC-2025-LON-003366, AC-2025-LON-003365, AC-2025-LON-003378, AC-2025-LON-003370, and AC-2025-LON-003398 Between The King on the application of Thomas Mithan Harriet Bridgeman Harry Simpson Edmond Haxhia Steven Hunt -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department Republic of Albania (Interested party) The post Edmond Haxhia and others -v- Republic of Albania, and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"Edmond Haxhia and others -v- Republic of Albania, and others","id":2846433,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/edmond-haxhia-and-others-v-republic-of-albania-and-others/"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 941 (KB) Case No: QB-2021-002484 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 24 April 2026 Before: Mr Justice Garnham Between: David Abbott and others -v- Ministry of Defence The post David Abbott and others -v- Ministry of Defence appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/david-abbott-and-others-v-ministry-of-defence/","id":2846434,"title":"David Abbott and others -v- Ministry of Defence"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/judith-allison-pearson-v-chief-constable-of-essex-police-and-another/","title":"Judith Allison Pearson -v- Chief Constable of Essex Police and another","id":2846435,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 961 (KB) Case No: KB-2025-002704 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Media and Communciations List 24 April 2026 Before: Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: Judith Allison Pearson -v- Chief Constable of Essex Police Roger Hirst The post Judith Allison Pearson -v- Chief Constable of Essex Police and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf77/2026caf77.html","id":2845858,"title":"Canada (Procureur général) c. Joseph, 2026 CAF 77 (CanLII)","description":"prestations — régime — rémunération assurable hebdomadaire — déduit —"},{"id":2845859,"title":"Mackinnon v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 FCA 78 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca78/2026fca78.html","description":"Practice — Mootness Practice — Parties — Interventions Federal Court jurisdiction — Trial"},{"link":"http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2026/04/23/bankruptcies-increase-119-percent","id":2845409,"title":"Bankruptcies Increase 11.9 Percent","description":"Bankruptcy filings increased 11.9 percent during the 12-month period ending March 31,"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2098/index.do","id":2845406,"title":"Ontario c. S.E.E.F.P.O. - 2003 CSC 64 - [2003] 3 RCS 149 - 2003-11-06","description":"Droit du travail Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Droit criminel Législation Document mis-à-jour le","id":2845408,"title":"R. c. Archambault - 2024 CSC 35 - 2024-11-01","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/20723/index.do"},{"description":"Case number: AC-2026-LON-001869 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court In the matter of an application for judicial review 22 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Sheldon Between: The King on the application of KSN (Claimant) -v- (1) Central Bedfordshire Council (2) The Governing Body of Holywell Academy (3) Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Constabulary (Defendants) Order On an application by the Claimant for interim relief and expedition Following consideration of the documents lodged by the Claimant ORDER by the Honourable Mr Justice Sheldon Anonymity : (a) Pursuant to CPR 39.2(4) and the Court’s inherent jurisdiction: (i) the names of the Claimant and her son are to be withheld from the public and must not be disclosed in any proceedings in public; (ii) the Claimant is to be referred to orally and in writing as “KSN”; (iii) the Claimant’s son is to referred to orally and in writing as “LAI”. (b) Pursuant to s. 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, there must be no publication of the identity of the Claimant or her son or of any matter likely to lead to the identification of the Claimant or her son in any report of, or otherwise in connection with, these proceedings. (c) Pursuant to CPR 5.4C(4), unless the Court grants permission under CPR 5.4C(6), no non-party may obtain a copy of any unredacted statement of case. (d) Any person wishing to vary or discharge this Order must make an application, served on each party. The Defendants shall file and serve a response to the application for interim relief, and their Acknowledgment of Service, by 4pm on 11 May 2026. The Claimant shall, if she wishes, file and serve any reply to the response and/or Acknowledgment of Service by 4pm on 15 May 2026. The Court shall consider the application for interim relief and permission on the papers in the week commencing 18 May 2026. The case is suitable for a deputy judge of the High Court. Liberty to apply to vary or set aside the order on 48 hours’ notice to the other party. Reasons I make an order for anonymity of the Claimant and her son in this case as the claim involves matters affecting a child under the age of 18 who is suffering from learning difficulties. This justifies a derogation from the principle of open justice, subject to any representations that the Defendants or any media parties wish to make about anonymity. The Claimant (KSN) makes a series of complaints about the various Defendants. Whilst there is some urgency to the matter as the case concerns the Claimant’s son (LAI), the suitability of his educational arrangements and child protection procedures, it is not so urgent that interim relief needs to be provided at this stage without hearing from the Defendants. With respect to a child protection meeting that was due to take place today, by the time that the application came before me the meeting may well have taken place so any relief would have been futile. Nevertheless, I would not have granted interim relief as such a meeting does not have irrevocable consequences. It is the first in a series of meetings before any decisions are taken with respect to the safeguarding of a child. I have made directions that should lead to the application for interim relief and permission considered on the papers in the week commencing 18 May 2026. Signed: Mr Justice Sheldon 22 April 2026 The post KSN -v- Central Bedfordshire Council and others (anonymity order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2844173,"title":"KSN -v- Central Bedfordshire Council and others (anonymity order)","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/ksn-v-central-bedfordshire-council-and-others-anonymity-order/"},{"id":2843610,"title":"Dubé c. Guilde canadienne des médias, 2026 CAF 76 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf76/2026caf76.html","description":"syndicat — plainte — circonstances exceptionnelles — canadienne des médias —"},{"id":2843188,"title":"Sharon O’Brien -v- HM Assistant Coroner for Sefton, Knowsley and St Helens","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sharon-obrien-v-hm-assistant-coroner-for-sefton-knowsley-and-st-helens/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 499 Case No: CA-2025-000589 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice His Honour Judge Sephton KC sitting as a Judge of the High Court AC-2023-MAN-000263 22 April 2026 Before: Lord Justice Newey Lord Justice Edis Lady Justice Whipple Between: The King on the application of Sharon O’Brien -v- HM Assistant Coroner for Sefton, Knowsley and St Helens and The Chief Constable of Merseyside Police (Interested party) The post Sharon O’Brien -v- HM Assistant Coroner for Sefton, Knowsley and St Helens appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2146/index.do","id":2841983,"title":"Harper c. Canada (Procureur général) - 2004 CSC 33 - [2004] 1 RCS 827 - 2004-05-18","description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/cxd-v-homerton-healthcare-nhs-foundation-trust-privacy-order/","id":2841982,"title":"CXD -v- Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (privacy order)","description":"Claim number: QB-2015-005927 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Clinical Negligence 13 March 2026 Before: Master Stevens Between: CXD (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) -v- Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Order UPON a case management conference by MS Teams AND UPON HEARING John de Bono KC for the Claimant and Edward Bishop KC for the Defendant BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED: This hearing shall be heard in private pursuant to CPR 39.2 because it involves confidential information, it is necessary to protect a child and it is in the interests of justice. A copy of this decision shall be published on the website of the judiciary of England Wales in accordance with CPR 39.2(5) Costs in the case. Dated 13 March 2026 The post CXD -v- Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (privacy order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"title":"Miron c. Trudel - [1995] 2 RCS 418 - 1995-05-25","id":2841064,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/1264/index.do","description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"id":2841063,"title":"Conseil canadien pour les réfugiés c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration) - 2023 CSC 17 - 2023-06-16","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19957/index.do","description":"Droit constitutionnel Immigration Document mis-à-jour le"},{"title":"Shaun Thompson and another -v- The Met Police Commissioner","id":2841059,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/shaun-thompson-and-another-v-the-met-police-commissioner/","description":"Case No: AC-2024-LON-001764 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Divisional Court [2026] EWHC 915 (Admin) 21 April 2026 Before: Lord Justice Holgate Mrs Justice Farbey Between: The King on the application of Shaun Thompson and Silkie Carlo -v- The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and The Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener) The post Shaun Thompson and another -v- The Met Police Commissioner appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/manchester-university-nhs-foundation-trust-v-m-and-others/","title":"Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust -v- M and others","id":2841060,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 812 (Fam) Case No: FD25P00374 In the High Court of Justice Family Division Sitting at the Manchester Civil Justice Centre 2 April 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Hayden Between: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust -v- M F G (A Minor by her Children’s Guardian) The post Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust -v- M and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 878 (Fam) Case No: CM23P92382 In the High Court of Justice Family Division In the matter of the Family Law Act 1986 21 April 2026 Before: The Rt Hon Sir Andrew McFarlane President of the Family Division Re N (Paternity: Unregulated Sperm Donor) The post Re N (Paternity: Unregulated Sperm Donor) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2841061,"title":"Re N (Paternity: Unregulated Sperm Donor)","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/re-n-paternity-unregulated-sperm-donor/"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 488 Case No: CA-2025-000651 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Media and Communications List Mrs Justice Collins Rice [2025] EWHC 111 (KB) 21 April 2026 Before: Dame Victoria Sharp, President of the King’s Bench Division Lord Justice Lewison Lord Justice Warby Between: RTM -v- Bonne Terre Limited Hestview Limited and The Information Commissioner (Intervener) The post RTM -v- Bonne Terre Limited and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2841062,"title":"RTM -v- Bonne Terre Limited and another","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rtm-v-bonne-terre-limited-and-another/"},{"description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2839667,"title":"R. c. Spence - 2005 CSC 71 - [2005] 3 RCS 458 - 2005-12-02","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2253/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca74/2026fca74.html","id":2839077,"title":"Canada (Attorney General) v. Medline Canada Corporation, 2026 FCA 74 (CanLII)","description":"Customs and Excise — Customs tariff — Interpretation of \"for use in\" in tariff item"},{"description":"Practice — Appeals and new trials — Extension of time — Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, Rule","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca75/2026fca75.html","id":2839078,"title":"Solakian v. Canada Post Corporation, 2026 FCA 75 (CanLII)"},{"description":"Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21471/index.do","id":2838912,"title":"R. c. Maadani - 2026 CSC 11 - 2026-04-17"},{"title":"R. c. Downes - 2023 CSC 6 - [2023] 1 RCS 277 - 2023-03-10","id":2838910,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19734/index.do","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Document mis-à-jour le","id":2838911,"title":"R. c. Chatillon - 2023 CSC 7 - [2023] 1 RCS 306 - 2023-03-15","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19772/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc11/2026scc11.html","id":2838318,"title":"R. v. Maadani, 2026 SCC 11 (CanLII)","description":"Droit criminel — Moyens de défense — Due diligence"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19639/index.do","id":2837438,"title":"R. c. Hilbach - 2023 CSC 3 - [2023] 1 RCS 116 - 2023-01-27","description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Document mis-à-jour le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19693/index.do","title":"R. c. McGregor - 2023 CSC 4 - [2023] 1 RCS 198 - 2023-02-17","id":2837439},{"id":2837440,"title":"R. c. Metzger - 2023 CSC 5 - [2023] 1 RCS 267 - 2023-03-03","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/19677/index.do","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le"}]