[{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/gatwick-airport-limited-v-secretary-of-state-for-transport/","title":"Gatwick Airport Limited -v- Secretary of State for Transport","description":"Claim number: AC-2026-LON-002801 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 19 June 2026 Before: The Hon. Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: The King on the application of Gatwick Airport Limited -v- Secretary of State for Transport Order On an application by the Claimant for urgent consideration, directions and interim relief Following consideration of the documents lodged by the Claimant, the Written Submission of the Secretary of State and witness statement of David Silk dated 18 June 2026 and further written submissions by email from the parties on 18 June 2026 (including an email sent on behalf of the International Air Transport Association (“IATA”) ORDER BY THE HON. MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN Rolled-up hearing: The application for permission to apply for judicial review is adjourned to be listed as a “rolled-up” hearing. If permission is granted, the court will proceed immediately to determine the claim. Expedition and directions: The rolled-up hearing is to be listed on an expedited basis. The parties must by 2pm on 19 June 2026 liaise among themselves and with the Administrative Court List Office and must file a note of the directions sought (if possible, in agreed form; otherwise, competing versions may be submitted). Interim relief: (a) The application for interim relief is to be considered at a hearing at 12 noon on Monday 22 June 2026. (b) The claimant must file and serve electronic hearing and authorities bundles for the interim relief hearing by 4pm on 19 June 2026 (in accordance with the guidance in the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide). (c) The parties must file skeleton arguments (maximum 10 pages) by 9 am on Monday 22 June 2026. (d) The application for immediate interim relief in the form of an order suspending the effect of the Airports Slot Allocation (Alleviation of Usage Requirements) Regulations 2026 in the period pending the interim relief hearing is refused. Service: This Order will be sealed on 19 June 2026. The unsealed version is to be sent to the parties by email immediately. The claimant is to email a copy of the unsealed version of this Order to a proper representative of every airline operating from Gatwick Airport and to IATA. Reasons (1) By this claim, the claimant challenges the Airports Slot Allocation (Alleviation of Usage Requirements) Regulations 2026, which amend an EU Regulation having effect as retained EU law. The effect of the challenged Regulations is to reduce from 80% to 70% the percentage of slots at UK airports which airlines are required to use in order to maintain their allocation of slots. The defendant says that the Regulations are necessary in the light of the disruption to shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz, which gives rise to risks to the viability of airline schedules. (2) The Regulations are made under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and are required to be made under the draft affirmative procedure. They were laid were laid in draft on 20 May 2026 and approved by the House of Commons on 10 June and by the House of Lords on 15 June. The Regulations were made by the Secretary of State on 17 June and are due to come into force on 19 June (i.e. tomorrow). (3) The Claim Form and supporting documents, accompanied by the application for urgent consideration seeking directions for expedition and interim relief, were filed on 17 June. Garnham J directed a response by 12 noon today. At 3.40pm today, I invited the parties to make further written submissions on three points. (4) I consider that the appropriate course is to fix a hearing to determine to grant interim relief on Monday 22 June 2026 at 12 noon. This means that the Regulations will come into force on 19 June. I have considered carefully whether to grant immediate interim relief to hold the ring until then but have decided not to do so for three reasons. (5) First, in the limited time available to me today, I have not been able to reach any firm views about the merits of the challenge. I note, however, that the success of","id":2969819},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/good-law-project-limited-v-reform-uk-party-limited/","id":2969820,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1458 (KB) Case No: KB-2025-001120 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Media and Communications List 19 June 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Murray Between: Good Law Project Limited -v- Reform UK Party Limited The post Good Law Project Limited -v- Reform UK Party Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"Good Law Project Limited -v- Reform UK Party Limited"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/al-libi-v-home-office/","title":"Al-Libi -v- Home Office","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1524 (KB) Case No: KB-2022-004569 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 19 June 2026 Before: Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: Mustafa Muhammad Masud Al-Jadid Al-Uzaybi (Abu Faraj Al-Libi) -v- The Home Office The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office The Attorney General The post Al-Libi -v- Home Office appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2969821},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-yuen-and-wai/","description":"In the Central Criminal Court 18 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb Between: Rex -v- Chung Biu (Bill) Yuen Chi Leung (Peter) Wai The post R -v- Yuen and Wai appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2968671,"title":"R -v- Yuen and Wai"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf114/2026caf114.html","description":"inconduite — disciplinaires — congédiement — nouvelle entité —","id":2965583,"title":"Uglar c. Banque Royale du Canada, 2026 CAF 114 (CanLII)"},{"description":"CLAIM NO: FL-2025 000009 FL-2024-000010 FL-2024-000011 FL-2025-000008 FL-2025-000010 FL-2025-000017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COMMERCIAL COURT (KBD) FINANCIAL LIST 17 JUNE 2026 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TROWER SITTING IN PUBLIC (SUBJECT TO INTERIM REPORTING RESTRICTIONS) BETWEEN: VARIOUS CLAIMANTS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULES TO THE CLAIMS -v- ENTAIN PLC REPORTING RESTRICTIONS ORDER UPON the application of Mr Kenneth Alexander, Mr Richard Cooper, Mr Lee Feldman and Mr Robert Hoskin (the “Charged Individuals”) dated 3 June 2026 to postpone certain reports of these proceedings to avoid a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in the ongoing related criminal proceedings known as R v Masterton (86IP4756716) and R v Hoskin (86IP4756725) (the “Criminal Proceedings”), (the “RRO Application”); AND UPON the media having been notified of the RRO Application by the Charged Individuals by email to PA Media and the Financial Times and provided with a draft of the order sought in the RRO Application; AND UPON the First CMC in these proceedings being listed before the Honourable Mr Justice Trower on 16-18 June 2026; AND UPON the Court having made a reporting restrictions order on 16 June 2026 at the outset of the First CMC on an interim basis postponing reporting of the First CMC as a whole until the determination of the issues on the RRO Application and the CPS Application dated 6 November 2025, so as to protect the object of the RRO Application and permit the media to remain in Court and make representations if appropriate (the “Interim RRO”); AND UPON the Court considering written representations on behalf of other defendants to the Criminal Proceedings, namely Mr Humberstone, Mr Rubitschek Smith, Mr MacAngus and Mr Dowling; AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Charged Individuals, Counsel for the Claimants, Counsel for the Defendant, Counsel for the CPS, and the media being in attendance but not making representations IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Interim RRO is discharged and replaced (with retrospective effect to the commencement of the CMC) as below. 2. Pursuant to section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 there shall be no report of these proceedings which: (a) refers to the RRO Application other than to the extent set out in this Order and its associated public ruling; (b) refers to any allegation of bribery, money laundering, or fraudulent conduct within the Defendant or for its benefit; (c) except that nothing in this Order prevents reference to any aspect of the alleged conduct of the Defendant as set out in paragraphs 8-9 of the Approved Summary of Judgment of the PKBD in R v Entain (Case No. U20231779) dated 5 December 2023, or in other public Court rulings or judgments until the conclusion of the Criminal Proceedings, or until further order, with liberty to apply on notice as provided in paragraph 5. Note, the Approved Summary of Judgment dated 5 December 2023 reads: “8. The conduct which is the subject of this DPA relates to the alleged failure by GVC, as a relevant commercial organisation, to prevent bribery contrary to section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 (the 2010 Act). The indictment period is from July 2011 (the date when the 2010 Act came into force) to December 2017 (the date that GVC disposed of its Turkish business). 9. The alleged bribery offences occurred primarily in Turkey. During the indictment period, Turkey was a jurisdiction in which gambling was non-legal. The phrase nonlegal in this context refers to services that were considered illegal by the Turkish authorities, or designated as illegal by Turkish domestic legislation, but which would not be illegal if offered in England and Wales where the provision of facilities for gambling (i.e. gaming, betting and/or lotteries) is legal if appropriately licensed and complies with the requirements of the Gambling Act 2005 (the 2005 Act).” 3. In respect of persons outside England and Wales: (a) Except as provided in","id":2965093,"title":"Various claimants listed in the schedules to the claims -v- Entain Plc","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/various-claimants-listed-in-the-schedules-to-the-claims-v-entain-plc/"},{"title":"Mr Patrick Asiimwe -v- The London Borough of Lambeth","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1479 (KB) Case No: KA-2025-000074 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division on appeal from the County Court at Central London Claim number: L00CL806 (HHJ BLOOM) 17 June 2026 Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Heather Williams DBE Between: Mr Patrick Asiimwe -v- The London Borough of Lambeth The post Mr Patrick Asiimwe -v- The London Borough of Lambeth appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2965094,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/mr-patrick-asiimwe-v-the-london-borough-of-lambeth/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/b-a-child-interim-separation/","id":2965095,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 748 Case No: CA-2026-001360 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Central Family Court Recorder Anderson ZC2650085 17 June 2026 Before: Lord Justice Baker Lord Justice Popplewell Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing B (A child) (Interim separation) The post B (A child) (Interim separation) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"B (A child) (Interim separation)"},{"title":"Justice Secretary -v- XDW","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1475 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-001596 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 17 June 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Pepperall Between; Secretary of State for Justice -v- XDW The post Justice Secretary -v- XDW appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2965096,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/justice-secretary-v-xdw/"},{"id":2960429,"description":"Customs and Excise — Excise Tax","title":"IWK Health Centre v. Canada, 2026 FCA 113 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca113/2026fca113.html"},{"title":"R -v- Charlotte Head and others","id":2959967,"description":"In the Crown Court at Woolwich 12 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Johnson Between: Rex -v- Charlotte Head Samuel Corner Leona Kamio and Fatema Zainab Rajwani The post R -v- Charlotte Head and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-charlotte-head-and-others/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/home-secretary-v-huda-ammori/","title":"Home Secretary -v- Huda Ammori","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 721 Case No: CA-2026-000583 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Divisional Court President of the King’s Bench Division, Swift and Steyn JJ [2026] EWHC 292 (Admin) 15 June 2026 Before: The Lady Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill, The Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls Lord Justice Edis, Vice-President of the the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Lord Justice Lewis Lady Justice Whipple Between: The Secretary of State for the Home Department -v- The King on the application of Huda Ammori and United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism Amnesty International UK Liberty (Interveners) The post Home Secretary -v- Huda Ammori appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2957610},{"title":"Threlfall c. Carleton University - 2019 CSC 50 - [2019] 3 RCS 726 - 2019-10-31","id":2954162,"description":"Document mis-à-jour le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/17986/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca112/2026fca112.html","title":"Canada (Transport) v. ITPS (Canada) Ltd., 2026 FCA 112 (CanLII)","id":2953653,"description":"Injunctions Practice — Judgments and orders — Reversal or"},{"title":"Société de l’Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick c. Canada (Premier ministre) - 2026 CSC 22 - 2026-06-12","id":2953182,"description":"Droit constitutionnel Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21539/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-sarah-ngaba/","title":"R -v- Sarah Ngaba","description":"At Birmingham Crown Court 12 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Brunner Between: R -v- Sarah Ngaba The post R -v- Sarah Ngaba appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2953178},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/andrew-tate-and-tristan-tate-v-director-of-public-prosecutions/","description":"Claim number: AC-2025-LON-003270 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 12 June 2026 Before: The Hon. Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: The King on the application of Andrew Emory Tate Tristan Tate -v- Director of Public Prosecutions and Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police Order Of the Court’s own motion; In the light of (i) the Order of Mr Justice Chamberlain of 6 March 2026, directing that the application for permission to apply for judicial review be determined at a hearing, with a time estimate of ½ day; and (ii) that hearing being listed on 23 June 2026; ORDER BY THE HON. MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN Any request for a direction under s. 85A(3)(b) of the Courts Act 2003 (“a transmission direction request”) by a person not taking part in the proceedings (“an applicant”) for permission to observe the proceedings remotely must be made by 10am on Monday 22 June 2026. Any transmission direction request should be sent by email to the following administrativecourtoffice.listoffice@justice.gov.uk address: and must include the following: (a) the full name of the applicant; (b) the email address of the applicant; (c) whether the applicant will be located within the jurisdiction of England and Wales at all times when attending the proceedings remotely (if a transmission direction were to be made); and, if not, details of the applicant’s location; (d) any information the applicant wishes to provide in support of the request, including in particular any reason(s) why it is contended that making such a direction would be in the interests of justice; and (e) a statement by the applicant in the following terms: “If permitted to attend the hearing remotely, I understand that I must not record or transmit what I see and hear. I understand that it is an offence and may be a contempt of court to do so, and that I may be punished if I were to do so.” Unless exceptionally the Court otherwise directs, a transmission direction request made otherwise than in accordance with this Order will not be granted. Reasons (1) The Court fixed a hearing on 23 June 2026 to determine the application for permission to apply for judicial review. The time estimate is ½ day. (2) This Order is made to ensure that any transmission direction requests are made in a timely manner, to ensure that they are accompanied by the necessary information and to enable them to be considered and determined prior to the hearing. The post Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate -v- Director of Public Prosecutions appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2953179,"title":"Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate -v- Director of Public Prosecutions"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-nerijus-kuneckis/","id":2953180,"description":"At the Central Criminal Court 12 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of HHJ Lucraft KC Rex -v- Nerijus Kuneckis The post R -v- Nerijus Kuneckis appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Nerijus Kuneckis"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-davis-and-others/","title":"R -v- Davis and others","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 743 Case No : 202600364 B5 202502766 A5 202402517 A5 202402523 A1 202600365 B4 202600360 B4 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT PORTSMOUTH His Honour Judge Hetherington T20067152 ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT NOTTINGHAM Mr Recorder Mainds T20070694 ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT NOTTINGHAM His Honour Judge Bennett T20087266, T20087241 & T20087143 ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT LEEDS His Honour Judge MacGill T20080720 ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT MANCHESTER His Honour Judge Blake T20097272 ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT AT PRESTON His Honour Judge Anthony Russell KC T20091650-1 12 June 2026 Before: THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION (Lord Justice Edis) LADY JUSTICE MAY and MR JUSTICE LAVENDER Between: JAY JERMAINE DAVIS -v- The King and JERRY TOLBERT -v- The King and DAWAYNE ANTHONY McLAREN -v- The King and JORDAN WEBSTER -v- The King and STUART O’NEILL -v- The King and BENJAMIN HIBBERT -v- The King The post R -v- Davis and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2953181},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hmrc-v-bolt-services-uk-limited/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 720 Case No: CA-2025-001526 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) Mr Justice Meade and Judge Ashley Greenbank [2025] UKUT 00100 (TCC) 12 June 2026 Before: Sir Colin Birss, Chancellor of the High Court Lord Justice Arnold Lady Justice Falk Between: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs -v- Bolt Services UK Limited The post HMRC -v- Bolt Services UK Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2953177,"title":"HMRC -v- Bolt Services UK Limited"},{"title":"Société de l’Acadie du Nouveau-Brunswick v. Canada (Prime Minister), 2026 SCC 22 (CanLII)","description":"Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Equality rights — Language rights — Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 16(2),","id":2953000,"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc22/2026scc22.html"},{"title":"Committal for contempt of court: Plymouth Community Homes -v- Abdulrahim","description":"Case number: M00PL323 In the County Court at Plymouth 7 April 2026 Before: District Judge James Between: Plymouth Community Homes (Applicant/Claimant) -v- Abdulrahim (Respondent/Defendant) Transcript of judgment The post Committal for contempt of court: Plymouth Community Homes -v- Abdulrahim appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2951689,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/committal-for-contempt-of-court-plymouth-community-homes-v-abdulrahim/"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/753/index.do","title":"R. c. Swain - [1991] 1 RCS 933 - 1991-05-02","id":2950260,"description":"Droit constitutionnel Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2947210,"title":"Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz c. Canada (Procureur général); White, Ottenheimer & Baker c. Canada (Procureur général); R. c. Fink - 2002 CSC 61 - [2002] 3 RCS 209 - 2002-09-12","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2002/index.do"},{"title":"R. c. Underwood - 2025 CSC 14 - 2025-04-17","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2945494,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/20971/index.do"},{"id":2945493,"description":"Droit des communications Document mis-à-jour le","title":"Telus Communications Inc. c. Fédération canadienne des municipalités - 2025 CSC 15 - 2025-04-25","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/20977/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hossain-and-others-v-the-home-office/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1413 (KB) Case Nos: QB-2020-003667; QB-2022-001062; QB-2020-004075 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 10 June 2026 Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Heather Williams DBE Between: (2) Mosaraf Hossain (6) Naveed Khan (11) Ashiqur Rahman -v- The Home Office The post Hossain and others -v- the Home Office appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2945492,"title":"Hossain and others -v- the Home Office"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/f-g-and-h-return-home-under-supervision-order/","id":2945490,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 713 Case No: CA-2026-000686 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Family Court at West London HH Judge Willans ZW25C50133 10 June 2026 Before: Lord Justice Peter Jackson Lord Justice Newey Lord Justice Baker F, G and H (return home under supervision order) The post F, G and H (return home under supervision order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"F, G and H (return home under supervision order)"},{"title":"Janet Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson & Johnson and others","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1403 (KB) Case No: KB-2026-000030 KB-2026-000032 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 10 June 2026 Before: Mrs Justice Hill DBE Senior Master Cook Between: Janet Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson Management Limited Kenvue UK Limited The post Janet Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson & Johnson and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2945491,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/janet-fuschillo-and-others-v-johnson-johnson-and-others-2/"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf107/2026caf107.html","title":"Bell Canada c. Société de perception de droit d'auteur du Canada, 2026 CAF 107 (CanLII)","description":"transitoires — règlement — retransmission — terme du second réexamen —","id":2944795},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/1700/index.do","title":"R. c. Beaulac - [1999] 1 RCS 768 - 1999-05-20","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2944543},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/1040/index.do","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2944544,"title":"R. c. Gosset - [1993] 3 RCS 76 - 1993-09-09"},{"title":"R -v- Clifton George","description":"At Snaresbrook Crown Court 9 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Constable Between: Rex -v- Clifton George The post R -v- Clifton George appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2944542,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-clifton-george/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-ab/","title":"R -v- AB","description":"In the Crown Court at Birmingham 8 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Lambert Between: Rex -v- AB The post R -v- AB appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2942957},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sara-kawsar-v-met-police-commissioner/","title":"Sara Kawsar -v- Met Police Commissioner","id":2942958,"description":"Claim No: 058DC861 In the County Court at Chelmsford 8 June 2026 Before: HHJ Duddridge Between: Sara Kawsar -v- The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis The post Sara Kawsar -v- Met Police Commissioner appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Neutral citation number: [2026] UKFTT 00844 (GRC) Case Reference: FT/EJ/2025/0007 First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Enforcement Heard on: 29 April 2026 by Cloud Video Platform Decision given on: 5 June 2026 Before: Judge Armstrong-Holmes Judge Saward Between: The Judicial Appointments Commission -v- Professor Barnie Choudhury The post The Judicial Appointments Commission -v- Professor Barnie Choudhury appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2940354,"title":"The Judicial Appointments Commission -v- Professor Barnie Choudhury","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-judicial-appointments-commission-v-professor-barnie-choudhury/"},{"id":2936414,"description":"Crown — Duty to consult Administrative law — Judicial review — Standard of","title":"Sierra Club Canada Foundation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2026 FCA 110 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca110/2026fca110.html"},{"title":"R. c. Berg - 2026 CSC 21 - 2026-06-05","description":"Droit criminel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2935953,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21465/index.do"},{"description":"Responsabilité délictuelle Document mis-à-jour le","id":2935954,"title":"Andrews c. Grand Toy Alberta Ltd. - [1978] 2 RCS 229 - 1978-01-19","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2587/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-paul-quinn/","id":2935948,"description":"In the Crown Court at Manchester 5 June 2026 Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Bright R -v- Paul Quinn The post R -v- Paul Quinn appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Paul Quinn"},{"id":2935949,"description":"At Cambridge Crown Court 5 June 2026 Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Sweeting R -v- Emma Barnett The post R -v- Emma Barnett appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Emma Barnett","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-emma-barnett/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-zulkernain-ahmed-and-armaan-ahmed/","description":"At Sheffield Crown Court 4 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Tipples Between: Rex -v- Zulkernain Ahmed Armaan Ahmed The post R -v- Zulkernain Ahmed and Armaan Ahmed appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2935950,"title":"R -v- Zulkernain Ahmed and Armaan Ahmed"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/wilden-v-person-unknown/","title":"Wilden -v- Person Unknown","description":"Case No: KB-2026-000801 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Date: 5th June 2026 Before : DHCJ Guy Vassall-Adams KC Between : Stephen Wilden – and – Person Unknown Huobi Global S.A (a company incorporated in Panama) The post Wilden -v- Person Unknown appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2935951},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/dd-v-ee/","description":"Case No: FD26P00134 In the High Court of Justice Family Division Date: 5 June 2026 Before: H Markham KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge Between: DD -v- EE The post DD -v- EE appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2935952,"title":"DD -v- EE"},{"id":2935769,"description":"Criminal law — Evidence — Witnesses — Credibility — Sexual","title":"R. v. Berg, 2026 SCC 21 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026canlii32678/2026canlii32678.html"},{"title":"R -v- J, N and E: court transcript of sentencing hearing","id":2933015,"description":"Please note that this is a court transcript of the sentencing hearing, rather than sentencing remarks which are usually published on the website Case No: 44SC0053025 (T20257005) In the Crown Court at Southampton 21 May 2026 Before: His Honour Judge Rowland Between: R -v- J, N and E The post R -v- J, N and E: court transcript of sentencing hearing appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-j-n-and-e-court-transcript-of-sentencing-hearing/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-peter-corrigan-and-chas-corrigan/","title":"R -v- Peter Corrigan and Chas Corrigan","id":2933014,"description":"In the Crown Court sititng in Cambridge 4 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Dexter Dias Between: R -v- Peter Corrigan and Chas Corrigan The post R -v- Peter Corrigan and Chas Corrigan appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/fgh-v-university-hospitals-dorset-nhs-foundation-trust-anonymity-order/","description":"Claim number: QB-2021-003211 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 3 June 2026 Before: Senior Master Cook Between: FGH (a minor, by his mother and litigation friend, RTY) (Claimant) -v- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (Defendant) Anonymity order BEFORE Senior Master Cook sitting at Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL. UPON HEARING Counsel for the Claimant and Leading Counsel for the Defendant AND UPON the application notice dated 26 May 2026 AND UPON considering the Article 8 rights of the Claimant and the dependants to respect for private and family life and the risk of harm that identification may cause to the Claimant and the dependants AND UPON CONSIDERING the importance of open justice and the Article 10 right to freedom of expression AND UPON THE COURT CONSIDERING that non-disclosure of the identity of the Claimant and the dependants is necessary to secure the proper administration of justice and to protect the interests of the Claimant and the dependants AND UPON THE COURT FURTHER CONCLUDING that it is necessary to make a reporting restriction order. IT IS ORDERED that The names of the Claimant and the Litigation Friend are to be withheld in the statements of case, and in any judgments and orders in this claim, and for those purposes: (i) The Claimant shall be referred to as FGH; (ii) The Litigation Friend shall be referred to as RTY; The Claimant’s address on the claim form shall be substituted by the Claimant’s solicitor’s address. No report, whether oral or in writing, or other communication in whatever form (including internet or social media) addressed to the public at large or any section of the public, of or concerning this claim which is published from the date of this order may include: (a) The name, address, workplace, school or any other specific feature of the Claimant. (b) Any particulars likely to lead to the identification of the Claimant or litigation friend. (c) Any image or likeness of the Claimant or litigation friend. Any reports or other communications to the public which exist prior to the date of this order are not affected by this order. Pursuant to CPR Rules 5.4C and 5.4D: (i) A person who is not a party to the proceedings may not obtain a copy of a statement of case, judgment or order from the Court records unless the statement of case, judgment or order has been anonymised in accordance with subparagraphs 1, 2 and 3 above. (ii) If a person who is not a party to the proceedings applies (pursuant to CPR r.5.4C(2)) for permission to inspect or obtain a copy of any other document or communication, such application shall be on at least 7 days’ notice to the Claimant’s solicitor, trustee or deputy unless the court orders otherwise. The Claimant’s solicitor shall file with the Court copies of any existing statements of case anonymised in accordance with paragraph 1 and 2 above by [21 days from date of the order]. The Court file shall be clearly marked with the words “An anonymity order was made in this case on 3 June 2026 and any application by a non-party to inspect or obtain a copy document from this file must be dealt with in accordance with the terms of that Order.” Any interested party, whether or not a party to the proceedings, may apply to the Court to vary or set aside this Order, provided that any such application is made on 7 days’ notice to the Claimant’s solicitor, trustee or deputy. This order shall lapse automatically on the death of the Claimant and Litigation Friend whose benefit the order is made and its provisions shall have no effect from that time. Pursuant CPR 39.2(5) a copy of this Order shall be published on the website of the Judiciary of England and Wales (www.judiciary.uk). For that purpose, a court officer will send a copy of the order by email to the Judicial Office at judicialwebupdates@judiciary.uk. The post FGH -v- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2931338,"title":"FGH -v- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/aox-v-health-secretary-and-nhs-england/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1217 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-CDF-000077 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 4 June 2026 Before: Mr Justice Eyre Between: The King on the application of AOX -v- Secretary of State for Health and Social Care NHS England and Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall Police and Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (Interested parties) The post AOX -v- Health Secretary and NHS England appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2931339,"title":"AOX -v- Health Secretary and NHS England"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/caf/doc/2026/2026caf105/2026caf105.html","description":"réparation des navires — déclencher une grève illégale — franchir les piquets — employés affectés —","id":2928656,"title":"Canada (Procureur général) c. Conseil des métiers et du travail des chantiers maritimes du gouvernement fédéral, 2026 CAF 105 (CanLII)"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca106/2026fca106.html","id":2928657,"description":"Environment Administrative law — Judicial review — Certiorari Construction of statutes — S. 73(3)(a) of","title":"Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 FCA 106 (CanLII)"},{"title":"Metropolitan Police -v- UK Athletics Limited and Keith Davies","id":2928523,"description":"At the Central Criminal Court 2 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of HHJ Richard Marks Between: Metropolitan Police -v- UK Athletics Limited and Keith Davies The post Metropolitan Police -v- UK Athletics Limited and Keith Davies appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/metropolitan-police-v-uk-athletics-limited-and-keith-davies/"},{"title":"1048547 Ontario Inc. v. Fromfroid S.A., 2026 FCA 108 (CanLII)","id":2927852,"description":"Practice — Costs — Taxation — Classification of costs under r. 420(2)(b) — Obligation to pay costs under r. 420(2)(b) — Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98, r. 406(1),(2)(b), 420(2)(b), Rules 2, 409. Practice — Costs — Factors in","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca108/2026fca108.html"},{"id":2927853,"description":"Costs — Patent infringement Practice — Costs — Appeal and cross-appeal Patents —","title":"Proslide Teachnology Inc. v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd., 2026 FCA 109 (CanLII)","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca109/2026fca109.html"},{"id":2927592,"description":"In the Exeter Magistrates’ Court 2 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of Stuart Smith, District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Between: Drinking Water Inspectorate -v- South West Water Limited The post Drinking Water Inspectorate -v- South West Water Limited appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"Drinking Water Inspectorate -v- South West Water Limited","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/drinking-water-inspectorate-v-south-west-water-limited/"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca107/2026fca107.html","title":"Bell Canada v. Copyright Collective of Canada, 2026 FCA 107 (CanLII)","description":"Copyright — Practice Administrative law — Judicial review —","id":2925440},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-vickrum-singh-digwa/","title":"R -v- Vickrum Singh Digwa","description":"In Southampton Crown Court 1 June 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge William Mousley KC Honorary Recorder of Southampton and Resident Judge Between: The King -v- Vickrum Singh Digwa The post R -v- Vickrum Singh Digwa appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":2925052},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le","id":2919942,"title":"R. c. Cody - 2017 CSC 31 - [2017] 1 RCS 659 - 2017-06-16","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/16693/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca103/2026fca103.html","title":"Brant Investments Ltd. v. Canada, 2026 FCA 103 (CanLII)","description":"Judges and Courts — Tax Court of Canada — Reasons for judgment — Questions Practice — Evidence — Examination for","id":2919590},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca104/2026fca104.html","description":"Administrative law — Judicial review — Social Security Tribunal — Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23, s. 18(1)(a) — Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1970 (2nd SUPP.), c. 10, s.","id":2919591,"title":"Broitman v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 FCA 104 (CanLII)"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21532/index.do","id":2919143,"description":"Droit constitutionnel Nouveau document publié le","title":"R. c. Jacques-Taylor - 2026 CSC 20 - 2026-05-29"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21302/index.do","id":2919144,"description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le","title":"R. c. Vrbanic - 2026 CSC 19 - 2026-05-29"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2025/2025canlii125773/2025canlii125773.html","title":"R. v. Vrbanic, 2026 SCC 19 (CanLII)","id":2918912,"description":"Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Trial within reasonable time — case complexity — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s."},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc20/2026scc20.html","title":"R. v. Jacques-Taylor, 2026 SCC 20 (CanLII)","description":"Constitutional law — Charter of Rights — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s.","id":2918913}]