[{"id":3075145,"title":"R -v- Phillips","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-phillips/","description":"In the Crown Court sitting at Merthyr Tydfil 3 August 2026 Sentencing remarks of HHJ Tracey Lloyd-Clarke Between: R -v- Christopher Phillips The post R -v- Phillips appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-mehmood-and-others/","description":"In the Crown Court at Bradford 31 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Morris R -v- Mohammed Ibrahim Mehmood, Luqmaan Rehman, Hamza Rehman and Mohammed Tayyuba The post R -v- Mehmood and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3073267,"title":"R -v- Mehmood and others"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca134/2026fca134.html","description":"Administrative law — Judicial review — Remedies Citizenship and Immigration — Exclusion and removal — Inadmissible persons Practice — Stay of","title":"Zahrebelnyi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FCA 134 (CanLII)","id":3069881},{"id":3069464,"title":"SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. c. Bank of New York Mellon Corp. - 2026 CSC 29 - 2026-07-31","description":"Contracts Preuve Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21601/index.do"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-kevin-kelenda/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 1002 Case No: 202501394 B4 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from the Crown Court sitting at Woolwich HHJ Aubrey KC 01MP1305723 31 July 2026 Before: President of the King’s Bench Division Mrs Justice Cutts His Honour Judge Nigel Lickley KC Between: R -v- Kevin Kelenda The post R -v- Kevin Kelenda appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3069461,"title":"R -v- Kevin Kelenda"},{"title":"R -v- Adedoja and others","id":3069462,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-adedoja-and-others/","description":"In the Crown Court at Winchester 31 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of The Honourable Ms Justice Norton DBE Between: Rex -v- Adedoja, Bakas, Augustus and Wilson The post R -v- Adedoja and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3069463,"title":"Rahim -v- Defence Secretary and another","description":"Neutral Citation Number [2024] EWHC 3708 (Admin) AC-2023-LON-3184 and AC-2024-LON-454 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 4 October 2024 Published: 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Swift Between: The King on the application of Haziz Rahim -v- Secretary of State for Defence Secretary of State for the Home Department The post Rahim -v- Defence Secretary and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rahim-v-defence-secretary-and-another/"},{"id":3069456,"title":"BB -v- Met Police Commissioner","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1986 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-001063 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice McKendrick Between: The King on the application of BB -v- The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis The post BB -v- Met Police Commissioner appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/bb-v-met-police-commissioner/"},{"title":"A Local Authority -v- AC and others (Consent to Marriage)","id":3069457,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCOP 31 (T3) Case No: COP20011587 Court of Protection 24 July 2026 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Hayden Between: A Local Authority -v- (1) AC (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) (2) CA (3) BC (4) DD The post A Local Authority -v- AC and others (Consent to Marriage) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/a-local-authority-v-ac-and-others-consent-to-marriage/"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2043 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-000818 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: The King on the application of Bayswater Support Group Keira Bell James Esses -v- Health Research Authority Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and King’s College London South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Interested parties) The post Bayswater Support Group and others -v- Health Research Authority and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/bayswater-support-group-and-others-v-health-research-authority-and-another/","id":3069458,"title":"Bayswater Support Group and others -v- Health Research Authority and another"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2019 (KB) Case No: KB-2026-002079 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Dexter Dias Between: Oxfordshire County Council -v- (1) BEN CULLEN (2) KEVIN GOOD (3) RYAN BRIDGE (4) TRUDY WELLS (5) PERSONS UNKNOWN INTENDING TO (i) ATTACH FLAGS TO HIGHWAY STRUCTURES OR MARK FLAGS ON THE HIGHWAY IN THE COUNTY OF OXFORDSHIRE, (ii) HARASS MEMBERS OF OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL OR (iii) OBSTRUCT OR HARASS EMPLOYEES OR CONTRACTORS OF OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL INVOLVED IN THE REMOVAL OF FLAGS FROM HIGHWAY STRUCTURES The post Oxfordshire County Council -v- Ben Cullen and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/oxfordshire-county-council-v-ben-cullen-and-others/","title":"Oxfordshire County Council -v- Ben Cullen and others","id":3069459},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-robert-bush/","description":"At Hull Crown Court 31 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Hilliard Between: R -v- Robert Bush The post R -v- Robert Bush appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Robert Bush","id":3069460},{"description":"Evidence — Spoliation — Breach of contract — Damages —","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc29/2026scc29.html","title":"SS&C Technologies Canada Corp. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 2026 SCC 29 (CanLII)","id":3069028},{"id":3067260,"title":"Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council and another","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sex-matters-v-national-police-chiefs-council-and-another/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1954 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-002926 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Linden Between: The King on the application of Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and Secretary of State for the Home Department (interested party) The post Sex Matters -v- National Police Chief’s Council and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/peter-waddell-holdco-limited-v-bluebell-cars-holding-limited-and-others/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2028 (Ch) Petition No: CR-2024-003936 Claim No: CR-2025-01274 In the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Insolvency and Companies List (ChD) 31 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Marcus Smith Between: Peter Waddell HoldCo Limited -v- Bluebell Cars Holding Limited Bluebell Cars TopCo Limited Reza Fardad Laurence Vaughan and between: Peter Waddell HoldCo Limited Peter Waddell -v- Bluebell Cars Holding Limited Bluebell Cars TopCo Limited Bluebell Cars MidCo Limited Bluebell Cars BidCo Limited Bapchild Motoring World (Kent) Limited The post Peter Waddell HoldCo Limited -v- Bluebell Cars Holding Limited and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"Peter Waddell HoldCo Limited -v- Bluebell Cars Holding Limited and others","id":3067261},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 2002 (Admin) Case No: AC-2026-LON-000875 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Divisional Court 31 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Dingemans, Senior President of Tribunals The Honourable Mrs Justice Lieven DBE Between: The King on the application of Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government London Borough of Tower Hamlets The post Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Housing Secretary and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/royal-mint-court-residents-association-v-housing-secretary-and-another/","id":3067262,"title":"Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association -v- Housing Secretary and another"},{"description":"Claim No: KB-2026-002571 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 29 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Fordham Between: HSX -v- Daniel Ryan Kane Robert Samms Dylan Nelson The person or persons unknown (a) who have communicated with the Claimant by email from the email address dannyryan_94@hotmail.co.uk; or (b) who have communicated with the Claimant by ordinary text message from +1 917 722 9086; or (c) who has communicated with the Claimant by WhatsApp numbers +1 940 601 2821 and +44 7423 436872; or (d) who have communicated with the Claimant by Telegram accounts @edm2181 and @dg96dg; or (e) who have communicated with the Claimant via the Seeking dating website; or (f) who use or have used a Revolut account under the name Daniel Ryan with the GB IBAN GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and the BIC/SWIFT code REVOGB21; or (g) who use or have used the Wise bank account under the name Kane Robert Sams with IBAN: GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and BIC/SWIFT: REVOGB21 The post HSX -v- persons unknown and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hsx-v-persons-unknown-and-others-2/","id":3067258,"title":"HSX -v- persons unknown and others"},{"title":"Home Secretary -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission","id":3067259,"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 992 Appeal Nos: CA-2025-002134 Case Nos: AC-2024-LON-000883 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Dame Victoria Sharp P and Mrs Justice Farbey [2025] EWHC 2019 (Admin) 31 July 2026 Before: Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls Lord Justice Bean, Vice President of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lord Justice Singh Between: The King on the application of Secretary of State for the Home Department -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission and FGF (First Interested Party) and H7 H15 (Second and Third Interested Parties/Appellants) The post Home Secretary -v- Special Immigration Appeals Commission appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/home-secretary-v-special-immigration-appeals-commission/"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca133/2026fca133.html","description":"Procedure — Jurisdiction of the Federal Court — Default proceedings — ITO-Int'l Terminal Operators v. Miida Electronics — Whether the Federal Court had a statutory grant of jurisdiction to assess damages — Federal Courts Act, s. 17 invoked and rejected — Statutory limits on Federal Court jurisdiction emphasised — Appeal dismissed Statutory interpretation — Federal Courts Act, s. 17(4) — Conflicting claims — Roberts v. Canada — Whether “conflicting claims” includes “divided obligations” between the Crown and a band — Concurrent claims distinguished from irreconcilable claims — No evidentiary basis for competing claims regarding allocation of benefits — Appeal dismissed Statutory interpretation — Federal Courts Act, para. 17(5)(b) — Agent of the Crown — Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, s. 3 — Whether a band acted as an officer, servant, or agent of the Crown for membership services and benefits — De jure and de facto control required — Indian Act and funding documents insufficient to establish agency — Appeal dismissed Procedure — Natural justice — Participation after defence struck — Whether permitting the band to make submissions on jurisdiction violated procedural rights — Appellants allowed to object more than once — Court’s duty to satisfy itself of jurisdiction — Discretion to hear submissions upheld — Appeal","title":"Dumais Estate v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2026 FCA 133 (CanLII)","id":3066655},{"id":3066273,"title":"Statement of Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Director of the AO, Regarding Introduction of the Judicial Space and Facilities Management Effectiveness Act","link":"http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2026/07/30/statement-judge-robert-j-conrad-jr-director-ao-regarding-introduction-judicial-space-and-facilities"},{"link":"http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2026/07/30/federal-circuit-celebrates-independence-day-anniversary-through-history-and-civic-learning","description":"On the eve of the 250th anniversary of Independence Day, in the nation’s capital, the Federal Circuit Center for Innovation and Law invited the public to the Justice Up Close, History All Around civics program to explore how law, innovation, science, and civic action have shaped the","id":3066272,"title":"Federal Circuit Celebrates Independence Day Anniversary Through History and Civic Learning"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21588/index.do","id":3066271,"title":"Démocratie en surveillance c. Canada (Procureur général) - 2026 CSC 28 - 2026-07-30"},{"title":"HG (Abduction: Application to set aside Return Order)","id":3066269,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hg-abduction-application-to-set-aside-return-order/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 971 Case No: CA-2026-001581 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice Family Division Mr David Rees KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge FD26P00192 30 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Coulson Lord Justice Baker Lady Justice Whipple HG (Abduction: Application to set aside Return Order) The post HG (Abduction: Application to set aside Return Order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3066270,"title":"HXS -v- persons unknown and others","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hxs-v-persons-unknown-and-others-2/","description":"Claim No: KB-2026-002571 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 29 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Fordham Between: HXS -v- Daniel Ryan Kane Robert Samms Dylan Nelson The person or persons unknown (a) who have communicated with the Claimant by email from the email address dannyryan_94@hotmail.co.uk; or (b) who have communicated with the Claimant by ordinary text message from +1 917 722 9086; or (c) who has communicated with the Claimant by WhatsApp numbers +1 940 601 2821 and +44 7423 436872; or (d) who have communicated with the Claimant by Telegram accounts @edm2181 and @dg96dg; or (e) who have communicated with the Claimant via the Seeking dating website; or (f) who use or have used a Revolut account under the name Daniel Ryan with the GB IBAN GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and the BIC/SWIFT code REVOGB21; or (g) who use or have used the Wise bank account under the name Kane Robert Sams with IBAN: GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and BIC/SWIFT: REVOGB21 The post HXS -v- persons unknown and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3066268,"title":"The Mayor and Commonality and Citizens of the City of London -v- 48th Street Holdings Ltd and another","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 970 Case No: CA-2025-001425 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Charles Bagot KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) [2026] EWHC 1130 (KB) 29 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Bean (Vice-President of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division)) Lady Justice Falk Lord Justice Holgate Between: The Mayor and Commonality and Citizens of the City of London -v- 48th Street Holdings Ltd Principled Offsite Logistics Limited The post The Mayor and Commonality and Citizens of the City of London -v- 48th Street Holdings Ltd and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/the-mayor-and-commonality-and-citizens-of-the-city-of-london-v-48th-street-holdings-ltd-and-another/"},{"description":"Administrative law — Judicial review — Adequate alternative remedy — Whether Federal Court of Appeal erred in declining judicial review — Political oversight of an Officer of Parliament not an adequate alternative — Strickland v. Canada (Attorney General) factors and Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex applied — Order set aside — Matter remanded to proceed to Stage 2 Constitution — Courts — Supervisory jurisdiction — Privative clause — Whether Conflict of Interest Act, s. 66 can bar judicial review on questions of fact and law — Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 96 to 101 protect core minimum of legality review — Federal Courts Act, s. 18.1(4) grounds limited by statute — Declaration under Constitution Act, 1982, s. 52(1) — Provision of no force and effect to that extent — Appeal","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc28/2026scc28.html","id":3065978,"title":"Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28 (CanLII)"},{"id":3064748,"title":"Mitchell Winehouse -v- Parry and another","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1970 (KB) Case No: KB-2023-004194 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 29 July 2026 Before: Sarah Clarke KC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Between: Mr Mitchell Winehouse (suing as the personal representative of Amy Jade Winehouse (deceased)) -v- Ms Naomi Parry Ms Catriona Gourlay The post Mitchell Winehouse -v- Parry and another appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/mitchell-winehouse-v-parry-and-another/"},{"id":3064749,"title":"Re: S-O (Children) (Relocation and Prohibited Steps Order)","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/re-s-o-children-relocation-and-prohibited-steps-order/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 998 Case No: CA-2026-000789 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from Croydon County Court and Family Court His Honour Judge Major ME25P00152 & ZE25P00858 30 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Lewison Lord Justice Moylan Lord Justice Stuart-Smith Re: S-O (Children) (Relocation and Prohibited Steps Order) The post Re: S-O (Children) (Relocation and Prohibited Steps Order) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 969 Case No: CA-2026-000717 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Family Court at Exeter HH Judge Willsteed PL24P02662 30 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Newey Lady Justice Asplin Lord Justice Baker D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic abuse allegations) The post D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic abuse allegations) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/d-change-of-circumstances-domestic-abuse-allegations/","id":3064750,"title":"D (Change of Circumstances: Domestic abuse allegations)"},{"description":"Communications and technology — Telecommunications regulation — Contribution regime — Telecommunications Act, s. 23, subs. 46.5(1) — Whether monetization of spectrum licences by sale or subordination is a “telecommunications service” — National Contribution Fund, contribution-eligible revenues, non-telecommunications services revenues deductions — Spectrum allocated for telecommunications services treated as incidental — Appeal dismissed Procedure — Statutory appeal — Question of law or jurisdiction — Telecommunications Act, s. 64 — Whether dispute over “incidental” under Telecommunications Act, s. 23 is an extricable question of law — Application of legal standard to particular circumstances as mixed fact and law — Teksavvy Solutions Inc. v. Bell Canada, Canadian National Railway Company v. Emerson Milling Inc. applied — Appeal dismissed Administrative law — Reasons — Adequacy of reasons — Whether Commission’s reasons prevent meaningful appellate review — R. v. Sheppard, Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Energy Regulator) applied — Initial decision and review decision said to explain why spectrum sale and subordination are incidental — Reasons found sufficient in fair and contextual reading — Appeal dismissed Administrative law — Retroactivity — Retroactive decision-making — Whether Commission imposed a new contribution requirement for past revenues — Bell Canada v. Amtelecom Limited Partnership test for retroactive law — Review decision applied existing legal standard in Telecommunications Act, s. 23 to actual circumstances — No change to legal landscape found — Appeal dismissed Communications and technology — Telecommunications accounting — Operating revenues — Whether Commission erred in classifying spectrum sale and subordination revenues as operating revenues, including by reference to GAAP — Commission observed revenues were included in reported operating revenues — No legal ruling on interpretation of operating revenues made — Argument rejected as mischaracterization — Appeal","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca132/2026fca132.html","title":"Terrestar Solutions Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 FCA 132 (CanLII)","id":3063862},{"id":3063159,"title":"Rex -v- James Desborough","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rex-v-james-desborough/","description":"Case number: 50AC0528125 and 50AC0331225 In the Crown Court at Winchester 29 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of The Honourable Mr Justice Saini Between: Rex -v- James Desborough The post Rex -v- James Desborough appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/andrew-bridgen-v-matt-hancock/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 991 Case No: CA-2025-001579 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Media and Communications List Mrs Justice Collins Rice [2025] EWHC 926 (KB) 29 July 2026 Before: Lady Justice King Lord Justice Warby Lady Justice Whipple Between: Andrew Bridgen -v- Matt Hancock The post Andrew Bridgen -v- Matt Hancock appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3061303,"title":"Andrew Bridgen -v- Matt Hancock"},{"id":3061302,"title":"F (Children: Placement Orders: Proportionality)","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/f-children-placement-orders-proportionality/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 990 Case No: CA-2026-001246 In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the Family Court at Cardiff Her Honour Judge Scannell CF25C50176 29 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Edis (Vice President of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) Lord Justice Peter Jackson Lord Justice Dingemans (Senior President of Tribunals) F (Children: Placement Orders: Proportionality) The post F (Children: Placement Orders: Proportionality) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"link":"http://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/judiciary-news/2026/07/28/bankruptcies-rise-122-percent","description":"Bankruptcy filings rose 12.2 percent during the 12-month period ending June 30,","title":"Bankruptcies Rise 12.2 Percent","id":3060364},{"title":"R -v- Natasha Akhtar and others","id":3060363,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-natasha-akhtar-and-others/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 951 Case Nos: 202303048 B4, 202303062 B4 & 202303020 B4 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from the Crown Court at Leicester HHJ Spencer KC T20227026 28 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Jeremy Baker Mr Justice Bryan His Honour Judge Simon Hirst The Honorary Recorder of Lincoln (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court) Between: Ameer Jamal Sanaf Gulammustafa Natasha Akhtar -v- Rex The post R -v- Natasha Akhtar and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3058513,"title":"Wild Justice and Badger Trust -v- Natural England","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/wild-justice-and-badger-trust-v-natural-england/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1932 (Admin) Case No: AC-2024-LON-002644 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court sitting in London 28 July 2026 Before: Fordham J Between: The King on the application of Wild Justice Badger Trust -v- Natural England and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Interested party) The post Wild Justice and Badger Trust -v- Natural England appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 979 Case No: 202304377 B1 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from the Central Criminal Court Her Honour Judge Rebecca Trowler KC 202304377 B1 28 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Males Mrs Justice Cutts His Honour Judge Andrew Lees Between: Rex -v- William Osmond The post R -v- William Osmond appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-william-osmond/","id":3058514,"title":"R -v- William Osmond"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rex-v-daniel-day/","description":"Case Number: 01MP10624254 In the Crown Court at Southwark 27 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Baumgartner, The Hon Recorder of Westminster Between: Rex -v- Daniel Day The post Rex -v- Daniel Day appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3057726,"title":"Rex -v- Daniel Day"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21249/index.do","title":"R. c. Wilson - 2025 CSC 32 - 2025-10-24","id":3054181},{"title":"PHJ -v- UJV (penal notice)","id":3054180,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/phj-v-ujv-penal-notice/","description":"Claim No: KB-2026-002444 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING’S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LIST 23 July 2026 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE TIPPLES DBE BETWEEN: PHJ -v- UJV Penal notice IF YOU THE DEFENDANT DISOBEY THIS ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED OR FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER AND WILFULLY DISOBEYS THIS ORDER OR DOES ANYTHING WHICH HELPS OR PERMITS ANY PERSON TO WHOM THIS ORDER APPLIES TO BREACH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED, FINED OR HAVE THEIR ASSETS SEIZED. NOTICE TO ANYONE WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER You should read the terms of the Order and the Practice Guidance on Interim Non Disclosure Orders very carefully. You are advised to consult a solicitor as soon as possible. This Order prohibits the Defendant from doing the acts set out in paragraph 6 of the Order and obliges the Defendant to do the acts set out in paragraph 7 of this Order and continues certain provisions in the Order in this action made by Thornton J on 8 July 2026. This Order also prevents any person who knows of this Order from wilfully disobeying it or doing anything which helps or permits any person to whom this Order applies to breach the terms of this Order. If any person contravenes this Order they may be found guilty of contempt of court and they may be sent to prison or fined or their assets seized. If you have been served with this Order, you have the right to ask the Court to vary or discharge the Order on reasonable notice to the Claimant. THIS ORDER 1. This is an Injunction, with other orders as set out below, made against the Defendant on 23 July 2026 by the Judge identified above (the Judge) on the application (the Application) of the Claimant. The Judge: (a) read the witness statements referred to in Schedule A at the end of this Order; (b) considered the Order made without notice to the Defendant by Thornton J on 8 July 2026 (“the Thornton J Order”); (c) accepted the undertakings set out in Schedule B at the end of this Order; and (d) considered the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), section 12. 2. This Order was made at a hearing on notice to the Defendant. The Claimant was represented by leading counsel and the Defendant was not present or represented. The Judge determined that it was appropriate to proceed to hear the Application in the absence of the Defendant pursuant to CPR 23.11. 3. The Defendant (and anyone served with or notified of this Order) has a right to apply to the Court to vary or discharge the Order (or so much of it as affects them). ANONYMITY 4. Pursuant to section 6 HRA, and/or CPR 39.2 the Judge, being satisfied that it is strictly necessary, ordered that the anonymity provisions contained in the Thornton J Order be continued. ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 5. Upon the Judge being satisfied that it is strictly necessary the provisions concerning access to documents contained in the Thornton J Order be continued. INJUNCTION 6. Until trial or further Order of the Court, the Defendant must not: (a) use, publish or communicate or disclose to any other person (other than (i) by way of disclosure to legal advisers instructed in relation to these proceedings (the Defendant’s legal advisers) for the purpose of obtaining legal advice in relation to these proceedings or (ii) for the purpose of carrying this Order into effect or (iii) for the purpose of disclosure to the police or other appropriate law enforcement body all or any part of the information referred to in the Confidential Schedule to this Order (the Information); (b) publish any information which is liable to or might identify the Claimant as a party to the proceedings and/or as the subject of the Information or which otherwise contains material (including but not limited to the profession or age or nationality of the Claimant) which is liable to, or might lead to, the Claimant’s identification in any such respect, provided that nothing in this Order shall prevent the publication,"},{"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/18406/index.do","description":"Document mis-à-jour le","id":3053425,"title":"Uber Technologies Inc. c. Heller - 2020 CSC 16 - [2020] 2 RCS 118 - 2020-06-26"},{"title":"Zardev Inc. c. Dydzak - 2026 CSC 27 - 2026-07-24","id":3052512,"link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21587/index.do","description":"Biens Nouveau document publié le"},{"title":"Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson and Johnson and others","id":3052511,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/fuschillo-and-others-v-johnson-and-johnson-and-others/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1925 (KB) Case Nos: KB-2026-000030 KB-2026-001931and KB-2026-000032 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 24 July 2026 Before: Mrs Justice Hill DBE Between: Janet Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson and Johnson Johnson and Johnson Management Limited Kenvue UK Limited The post Fuschillo and others -v- Johnson and Johnson and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3052508,"title":"Hongchi Xiao -v- Rex","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 957 Case No: 202403091 B5 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from Winchester Crown Court Bright J 24 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Dingemans Senior President of Tribunals Mr Justice Murray HH Judge Andrew Lees Between: Hongchi Xiao -v- Rex The post Hongchi Xiao -v- Rex appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hongchi-xiao-v-rex/"},{"id":3052509,"title":"In the matter of contempt proceedings against Rajiv Menon KC","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/in-the-matter-of-contempt-proceedings-against-rajiv-menon-kc-3/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 966 Case No: 202602679/B3 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from the crown court at Woolwich Mrs Justice Cheema Grubb 24 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Males Mrs Justice Cutts In the matter of contempt proceedings against Rajiv Menon KC The post In the matter of contempt proceedings against Rajiv Menon KC appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"title":"R -v- Tony Lee Bartlett","id":3052510,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-tony-lee-bartlett/","description":"In the Crown Court at Bristol 24 July 2026 Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Cavanagh Between: The King -v- Tony Lee Bartlett The post R -v- Tony Lee Bartlett appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Real property — Accessory rule — Purchasers and riparian lots — Civil Code of Québec, art.","link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2026/2026scc27/2026scc27.html","title":"Zardev Inc. v. Dydzak, 2026 SCC 27 (CanLII)","id":3052242},{"title":"Re Patricia (MHA 1983 and s28 MCA 2005)","id":3050912,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/re-patricia-mha-1983-and-s28-mca-2005/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCOP 29 (T3) Case No: 14028041 In the Court of Protection in the matter of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in the matter of the Mental Health Act 1983 23 July 2026 Before: Mr Justice Peel Between: Patricia (by her Accredited Legal Representative) -v- Cygnet Healthcare Ltd Patricia’s father Patricia’s mother Patricia’s aunt The post Re Patricia (MHA 1983 and s28 MCA 2005) appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3050913,"title":"R -v- Ashley Lewis and Mutaro Mane","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-ashley-lewis-and-mutaro-mane/","description":"At the Central Criminal Court Old Bailey London 23 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Martyn Levett DL. Between: R -v- Ashley Lewis Mutaro Mane The post R -v- Ashley Lewis and Mutaro Mane appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"description":"Case number: URN: 01MP1160225 In the Crown Court at Woolwich 23 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Grout Between: The Crown -v- Tevin Nzita Anthony Dasousa Christopher Dasousa The post R -v- Nzita and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-nzita-and-others/","id":3050911,"title":"R -v- Nzita and others"},{"link":"https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2026/2026fca130/2026fca130.html","description":"Administrative law — Judicial review — Ccsm C resolutions — Canada Revenue Agency Act — S.C. 2020, c.","title":"Lennert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 FCA 130 (CanLII)","id":3050223},{"description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] UKIPTrib 4 IPT/24/466/CH (MR KEARNEY)& IPT/24/467/CH (BBC) IPT/24/771/H (MOORE) IN THE INVESTIGATORY POWERS TRIBUNAL 23 July 2026 BEFORE: THE PRESIDENT, LADY CARMICHAEL MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN MR STEPHEN SHAW KC BETWEEN: (1) MR VINCENT KEARNEY (2) BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION -v- (1) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND (2) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE DURHAM CONSTABULARY (3) SECURITY SERVICE (4) GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONSHEADQUARTERS (5) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND (6) SECRETARY OF STATE FORTHE HOME DEPARTMENT (7) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN, COMMONWEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAFFAIRS (8) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE FOR THE METROPOLIS and MR CHRISTOPHER DAVID SAMUEL MOORE -v- (1) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND (2) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE DURHAM CONSTABULARY (3) SECURITY SERVICE (4) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND (5) SECRETARY OF STATE FORTHE HOME DEPARTMENT (6) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN COMMONWEALTHAND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE (7) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE FOR THE METROPOLIS The post Vincent Kearney and the BBC -v- Chief Constable of Northern Ireland and others appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/vincent-kearney-and-the-bbc-v-chief-constable-of-northern-ireland-and-others/","id":3049782,"title":"Vincent Kearney and the BBC -v- Chief Constable of Northern Ireland and others"},{"description":"Claim No. KB-2023-003361 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING’S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LIST 23 July 2026 BEFORE: THE HON. MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN BETWEEN: MINISTRY OF DEFENCE -v- (1) GLOBAL MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED (2) INDEPENDENT DIGITAL NEWS AND MEDIA LIMITED (3) TIMES MEDIA LIMITED (4) ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS LIMITED (5) TELEGRAPH MEDIA HOLDINGS LIMITED (6) THE FINANCIAL TIMES LIMITED (7) THE PRESS ASSOCIATION LIMITED COMPANY and (8) BARINGS LIMITED Defendant for the purposes of costs only Order PENAL NOTICE IF YOU DISOBEY THIS ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED (IN THE CASE OF NATURAL PERSONS) OR FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER AND DISOBEYS THIS ORDER OR DOES ANYTHING WHICH HELPS OR PERMITS ANY PERSON TO WHOM THIS ORDER APPLIES TO BREACH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER OR WHO OTHERWISE UNDERMINES OR FRUSTRATES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE TERMS MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED, FINED OR HAVE THEIR ASSETS SEIZED. UPON the Claimant’s application heard on Friday 1 September 2023 for a contra mundum interim non-disclosure order on notice to Associated Newspapers Limited and to Global Media and Entertainment Limited, prohibiting publication or disclosure of information relating to the unauthorised disclosure in early 2022 of a database identifying the personal details and other data of Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (“ARAP”) and the Afghan Locally Employed Staff Ex Gratia Scheme (“EGS”) applicants, such incident being discovered by HMG in mid-August 2023 [such disclosure being identified herein as “the Data Incident”]; AND UPON Mr Justice Robin Knowles CBE making a contra mundum interim non-disclosure order with a non-disclosure provision [“the Super-injunction”] having effect until a return date of 1 December 2023; AND UPON Mr Justice Chamberlain having considered this matter further at hearings on (i) 13 October 2023, (ii) 31 October and 1 November 2023, (iii) 1 December 2023, (iv) 18 December 2023, (v) 1-2 February 2024, (vi) 27 March 2024, (vii) 30 April and 1 May 2024, 11 November 2024, (ix) 20-21 February 2025 and (x) 1, 7, 8, 11, 14, 15 and 17 July 2025; AND UPON Defendants (1) to (7) having been added at various times as Defendants to these proceedings [and being identified collectively herein as “the Media Defendants”]; AND UPON Barings Limited (trading as Barings Law), having made applications (i) orally through counsel at a hearing on 23 May 2025, for an order that the Claimant pay its costs of and associated with directions hearings in these proceedings on 19 and 23 May 2025; and (ii) in written submissions dated 16 June 2025, that Barings Limited be added as a party for the purposes of costs only; AND UPON Mr Justice Chamberlain having made an order, dated 25 June 2025, that Barings Limited be added as a Defendant for the purposes of costs only; AND UPON the Special Advocates making submissions in CLOSED on the 1 July 2025 that the Super-injunction should be discharged; AND UPON hearing submissions from counsel for the Claimant, leading counsel for the Media Defendants and the Special Advocates, concerning the publication of material previously disclosed in OPEN (IN PRIVATE) in these proceedings, at hearings in OPEN (IN PRIVATE) and in CLOSED on 26 June, 1, 4, 7, 8, 11 and 14 July 2025; AND UPON Mr Justice Chamberlain having made a ruling on 1 July 2025 as to redactions on national security grounds to certain parts of the material in the OPEN (IN PRIVATE) bundles in these proceedings (“the 1 July 2025 ruling”); AND UPON the Claimant and the Media Defendants having subsequently agreed how the 1 July 2025 ruling should be applied to the remainder of the material in the OPEN (IN PRIVATE) bundles; AND UPON the Claimant applying to the Court on 4 July 2025 to discharge the Super-injunction; AND UPON the Media Defendants and the Special Advocates supporting the request for discharge of the Super-injunction; AND","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/ministry-of-defence-v-global-media-and-entertainment-limited-and-others-2/","id":3049783,"title":"Ministry of Defence -v- Global Media and Entertainment Limited and others"},{"title":"Mohammad Alazawi -v- R","id":3048321,"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/mohammad-alazawi-v-r/","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Crim 947 Case No: 202501935 B4, 2025028670 B4 In the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from the Crown Court at Southwark His Honour Judge Gregory Perrins T20237059 23 July 2026 Before: Lady Justice May DBE Mr Justice Saini His Honour Judge Picton (Sitting as a Judge of the CACD) Between: Mohammad Alazawi -v- Rex The post Mohammad Alazawi -v- R appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3048322,"title":"Rex -v- Mohammed Asim Bashir","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/rex-v-mohammed-asim-bashir/","description":"In the Crown Court at Manchester (Crown Square) 23 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb Between: Rex -v- Mohammed Asim Bashir The post Rex -v- Mohammed Asim Bashir appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary"},{"id":3047130,"title":"Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court","description":"Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1842 (Admin) Case No: AC-2025-LON-003760 In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division Administrative Court Divisional Court 22 July 2026 Before: Lord Justice Popplewell Mr Justice Hilliard Between: The King on the application of Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court and The Environment Agency Philip Barker Clive Massey Mark Gregory (Interested parties) The post Matthew Wright -v- Medway Magistrates’ Court appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/matthew-wright-v-medway-magistrates-court/"},{"description":"In the High Court of Justice King’s Bench Division 18 July 2026 Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Farbey Between: HSX -v- (1) DANIEL RYAN (2) KANE ROBERT SAMMS (3) DYLAN NELSON (4) THE PERSON OR PERSONS UNKNOWN (a) who have communicated with the Claimant by email from the email address dannyryan_94@hotmail.co.uk ; (b) who have communicated with the Claimant by ordinary text message from +1 917 722 9086; (c) who has communicated with the Claimant by WhatsApp numbers +1 940 601 2821 and +44 7423 436872, (d) who have communicated with the Claimant by Telegram accounts @edm2181 and @dg96dg, (e) who have communicated with the Claimant via the Seeking dating website, (f) who use or have used a Revolut account under the name Daniel Ryan with the GB IBAN GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and the BIC/SWIFT code REVOGB21; (g) who use or have used the Wise bank account under the name Kane Robert Sams with IBAN: GB76 REVO 2301 2083 5150 68 and BIC/SWIFT: REVOGB21 Order PENAL NOTICE IF YOU THE INTENDED DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT DISOBEY THIS ORDER YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED OR FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER AND WILFULLY DISOBEYS THIS ORDER OR DOES ANYTHING WHICH HELPS OR PERMITS ANY PERSON TO WHOM THIS ORDER APPLIES TO BREACH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND MAY BE IMPRISONED, FINED OR HAVE THEIR ASSETS SEIZED. NOTICE TO ANYONE WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER You should read the terms of the Order and the Practice Guidance on Interim Non-Disclosure Orders very carefully. You are advised to consult a solicitor as soon as possible. This Order prohibits the Intended Defendant/Respondent from doing the acts set out in Paragraphs 9 and 13 of the Order and obliges the Intended Defendant/Respondent to do the acts set out in Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15 of the Order. This Order also prevents any person who knows of this Order from wilfully disobeying it or doing anything which helps or permits any person to whom this Order applies to breach the terms of this Order. If any person contravenes this Order they may be found guilty of contempt of court and they may be sent to prison or fined or their assets seized If you have been served with this Order, you have the right to ask the Court to vary or discharge the Order on reasonable notice to the Intended Claimant/Applicant. THIS ORDER 1. This is an Injunction, with other orders as set out below, made against the Defendants on 18 July 2026 by the Judge identified above (the Judge ) on the application (the Application ) of the Claimant. The Judge: (a) read the witness statement referred to in Schedule A at the end of this Order and was given information orally by Counsel on behalf of the Claimant; (b) accepted the undertakings set out in Schedule B at the end of this Order; and (c) considered the provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 ( HRA ), section 12. 2. This Order was made at a hearing without-notice to those affected by it, the Court having considered section 12(2) HRA and being satisfied that there are compelling reasons for notice not being given, namely the threat by the Defendants of imminent publication of the Information (as defined below) and the threat by the Defendants to damage the Claimant should action be taken against them. The Defendants (and anyone served with or notified of this Order) have a right to apply to the Court to vary or discharge the Order (or so much of it as affects them). ANONYMITY 3. Pursuant to section 6 HRA, and/or CPR 39.2 the Judge, being satisfied that it is strictly necessary, ordered that: (a) the Claimant be permitted to issue these proceedings naming the Claimant as “HSX” and giving an address c/o the Claimant’s solicitors; (b) the Claimant be permitted to issue these proceedings naming the Fourth Defendant as “Person or Persons Unknown” and, once it is known to the Claimant, notifying the Defendant’s home address by filing the same in a sealed letter which must remain sealed and held with the Court office subject","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hxs-v-persons-unknown-and-others/","title":"HXS -v- persons unknown and others","id":3044992},{"id":3043006,"title":"R -v- Emmanuel Avogo and Child B","description":"At Harrow Crown Court 20 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Bennathan Between: R -v- Emmanuel Avogo Child B The post R -v- Emmanuel Avogo and Child B appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-emmanuel-avogo-and-child-b/"},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-pearce-and-collins/","description":"Case number: PJ01C At the Central Criminal Court Old Bailey London 17 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge Martyn Levett DL Between: R -v- Mark Pearce Markie Collins The post R -v- Pearce and Collins appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","id":3041668,"title":"R -v- Pearce and Collins"},{"id":3039284,"title":"Renvoi : Résolution pour modifier la Constitution - [1981] 1 RCS 753 - 1981-09-28","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/2519/index.do","description":"Droit constitutionnel Document mis-à-jour le"},{"description":"Droit constitutionnel Droit de l'éducation Document mis-à-jour le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/7822/index.do","title":"Nguyen c. Québec (Éducation, Loisir et Sport) - 2009 CSC 47 - [2009] 3 RCS 208 - 2009-10-22","id":3038703},{"description":"Propriété intellectuelle Nouveau document publié le","link":"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/21581/index.do","title":"Pharmascience Inc. c. Janssen Inc. - 2026 CSC 26 - 2026-07-17","id":3037925},{"description":"In the Crown Court at Canterbury 17 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Johnson Between: Environment Agency -v- Southern Water The post Environment Agency -v- Southern Water appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/environment-agency-v-southern-water/","title":"Environment Agency -v- Southern Water","id":3037923},{"link":"https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-kiran-kaur/","description":"At Southampton Crown Court 17 July 2026 Sentencing remarks of His Honour Judge William Mousley KC Honorary Recorder of Southampton and Resident Judge Between: The King -v- Kiran Kaur The post R -v- Kiran Kaur appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary","title":"R -v- Kiran Kaur","id":3037924}]